A New Day at IPANM

 

 

information & issues

Welcome to IPANM’s Information & Issues webpage!

IPANM is not afraid to take strong stances on many current issues threatening our industry. We have to! Seemingly minor changes to regulations or rules can have a major impact on the financial solvency of our small oil & gas producers. While we will never compromise on our duties to protect human health, fresh water and the environment in our daily activities, we will fight unnecessary government overreach when new regulatory proposals are not based on sound science and do little to protect the environment.

Below, we’ve identified serious issues facing our producers. Please click on the corresponding button to learn more about each issue and IPANM’s stance on the issue. (Note: Some of this content may be restricted for members only. To access this exclusive content, please join our association!)

RECENT NEWS: All Issues

he Bureau of Land Management is moving forward with the public outreach sessions for the revisions to their Resource Management
Last week, the New Mexico Court of Appeals heard arguments on issues relating to the Surface Owners Protection Act (SOPA).
Last Monday, the members of the IPANM Air Quality Committee and I submitted comments to the EPA, Office of Planning,
Today, IPANM submitted comments to the BLM on their proposed Venting & Flaring policy changes which were mandated by the
IPANM held a two-day seminar on air quality issues on June 2-3, 2014 at the Sandia Resort and Casino. Below
Last Friday, a group of US Senators led by Senator Tom Udall (D-NM) and Senator Barrasso (R-WY) introduced S.2440, a
This spring, operators had to report their emissions from storage tanks and various other facilities to the EPA under SubPart
SLO Commissioner Ray Powell announce that on March 25th, his office enrolled an additional 150,000 acres in a Candidate Conservation
Last week, Congressman Pearce's office drafted, and got the entire New Mexico delegation to sign, a letter to Secretary Sally
On April 7th in the Federal Register, the USFWS filed a reopening of the comment period on the designation of

The Bureau of Land Management is moving forward with the public outreach sessions for the revisions to their Resource Management Plan. Please see the flyer below inviting IPANM members to participate in their meetings in Carlsbad and Artesia on July 8 and 9 to discuss “Lands with Wilderness Characteristics”
Workshop Flyer

This content is for members only.

Please login here! If you have any questions about your membership, please email megan@ipanm.org.

Last Monday, the members of the IPANM Air Quality Committee and I submitted comments to the EPA, Office of Planning, on the five whitepapers issued by that Agency. The whitepapers, which came about at the request of the President in his March 2014 Climate Change: Strategy to Reduce Methane Emissions Report, sought to create a technical basis for reducing methane emissions in the oil patch from compressors, pneumatic devices, completions from hydraulically fractured oil wells, and during the liquids offloading process. The final whitepaper sought to review the “science” on methane leaks at oil and gas facilities.

The EPA whitepapers were meant to be a technical review of the existing studies in order to give EPA a “robust understanding” of the issues, but in reality it was nothing more than a data dump from carefully selected studies that used mostly modeling and not actual measurement from the field. The one study that did use some measurements was completed by UT professors, but it only looked at oil and gas facilities in shale plays. The main point raised by IPANM in our responses to the EPA was that the studies on methane emissions were flawed as they had very small samples, huge and extremely flawed extrapolation methodology and the whitepapers relied on studies completed by biased entities. In every whitepaper, there was heavy reliance on a study of 22 locations that was commissioned by the Environmental Defense Fund. On every panel doing a “peer review” of the whitepapers, there was a person from the Environmental Defense Fund. A second point made by IPANM was that the EPA should not rush this process and should learn from the data submitted by industry to the recent NSPS OOOO regulations.

On June 2nd, IPANM also submitted lengthy comments to the BLM Venting & Flaring Public Outreach Powerpoint presentation. This initiative, also the result of the President’s March Climate Change Report, was intended as a first step towards developing regulations on reducing methane emissions from compressors, liquid unloading, hydraulically fractured natural gas wells, leaks and pneumatic devices. Note that the subject matter of these regulations are nearly identical to the issues reviewed by the EPA in their whitepapers, but the BLM claims it has the authority to force regulations on methane emissions under a legal theory of prevention of waste and royalty collections. IPANM strongly contested this assertion in our comments.

According to the President’s Climate Change Strategy to Reduce Methane Emissions Report, both the EPA and the BLM are to have all rules and regulations on these issues completed by the end of 2016.

All of the comments submitted to the EPA are available below:

IPANM Leaks Comments to EPA
IPANM Compressors Comments to EPA
IPANM Completions Hydraulically Fractured Oil Wells Comments to EPA
IPANM Unloading Comments to EPA
IPANM Pneumatic Devices Comments to EPA

Today, IPANM submitted comments to the BLM on their proposed Venting & Flaring policy changes which were mandated by the Whitehouse in its March 2014 Climate Strategy for Methane Reductions report. I have attached a copy of the comments to this email for you to read at your leisure. The IPANM comments will be distributed to the EPA as their pending whitepapers on methane reductions strategies are on the same topics. IPANM will be submitting comments to the whitepapers as well.

At the IPANM air quality workshop “UP the PIPE,” which was held last week in Albuquerque, the participants had the opportunity to learn about NSPS SubPart OOOO, the Whitehouse Climate Change Strategy, the BLM Venting plan and the EPA’s plans to further regulate methane emissions. We also had several sessions on the newly implemented Colorado Venting rules. We heard from some excellent experts from Trinity Consulting and TRC Companies as well as the regulators from EPA, BLM, NMED and CO. All the materials from the workshop are now on the IPANM website. The comments to the BLM and the EPA will be included at www.ipanm.org on the Regulatory tab as we submit them.

All the work to digest the technical papers and draft comments could not have been done without the extreme time and effort of IPANM Air Quality Committee members Bruce Stubbs, Kyle Alpers, Ed Hasely and Board President Richard Gilliland! Please thank these members for me when you see them. As always, if you have any questions or comments let us know.

BLM Venting & Flaring Comments by IPANM

IPANM held a two-day seminar on air quality issues on June 2-3, 2014 at the Sandia Resort and Casino. Below are links to the presentation information from the seminar:

CO & NM Air Issues
EPA Presentation, Comments, Documents
Subpart 0000 & Tribal
BLM Presentation and Comments
Overview and Obama Plans

June 26, 2014
IPANM Leaks Comments to EPA
IPANM Compressors Comments to EPA
IPANM Completions Hydraulically Fractured Oil Wells Comments to EPA
IPANM Unloading Comments to EPA
IPANM Pneumatic Devices Comments to EPA

BLM Venting & Flaring Comments by IPANM

Last Friday, a group of US Senators led by Senator Tom Udall (D-NM) and Senator Barrasso (R-WY) introduced S.2440, a bill to expand and extend the BLM pilot program created under the 2005 Energy Policy Act. The pilot program is set to expire in 2015 and New Mexico has two pilot offices which strive to have a multi-disciplinary approach to permitting.

In order to fund the increased staffing the BLM claims it needs, S.2440 will increase the permitting fee from the current $6,500 to $9,500. (Although I am told the fee is going up to $7,500 for 2015 anyway.) The $9,500 level would be set for 11 years starting in 2016 and could not be changed by the BLM through rule making although it is set to the consumer price index. According to Senator Udall’s staff, if the current provisions of the pilot program expire and the BLM were to do a rule making to set the APD fee, it would be minimum $11,000 per application.

In addition, S.2440 requires that from 2016 through FY 2019 that 15% of the bonus fees collected at the NM lease sales would have to stay with the NM BLM to assist with permitting needs. From 2020 to 2026 100% of the fee would go to the BLM Processing Improvement Fund for the agency to draw from for permitting costs. (Note that additional costs industry currently pays such as ‘rights-of way’ fees, air permitting fees to the BLM do not go into this fund and this fund can only be used for processing Applications for Permits to Drill.

The bill will also allow the secretary to designate new project offices anywhere in the US and does not limit funding for pilot offices just to offices in NM, WY, MT, CO, or UT as does the current law. S. 2440 adjusts the interest rate that industry receives on overpayment of oil and gas royalties from 3 percentage points over the Federal short term rate to 1 point over that rate. Note that the underpayment of royalty penalty is still 3 points over the Federal short term rate. The bill was referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. S. 2440 is co-sponsored by Sens. Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.); Heidi Heitkamp (D-N.D.); John Hoeven (R-N.D.); Mike Enzi (R-WY); Mark Udall (D-CO); Dean Heller (R-NV); John Walsh (D-MT); and James Inhofe (R-OK).

A copy of the pre-filed legislation is linked here.

This spring, operators had to report their emissions from storage tanks and various other facilities to the EPA under SubPart OOOO. The BLM is asking for comments to their venting and flaring proposed policy. The EPA released five white papers on reducing methane emissions from various facilities in the oil patch with comments due in June. The NMED has also asked for comment on their voluntary disclosure policy, and they finalized the GCP-6.

Are you confused and frustrated with the reporting requirements for operators when it comes to air quality issues?

On June 2 – 3rd, IPANM will be holding an educational workshop on federal and state air quality regulations, policies and proposals affecting oil and gas producers in New Mexico. The event will be held at Sandia Resort & Casino from 1pm June 2 to 4pm June 3.

On June 2, Trinity Consulting will present and educate members on quantifying and reporting air emissions under SubPart OOOO, Part W (greenhouse gases) and Indian lands. There will be discussion on the proposed venting policies from both EPA and BLM. June 2nd will be an industry-only day to openly learn, discuss and question the industry experts about the air issues.

On June 3rd, the government representatives have been invited to speak on their respective agency proposals. There will be opportunity for questions and discussions. NMED will discuss the development and use of the GCP-6 permit, the requirements for an NOI permit and the use of the current voluntary disclosure policy. The BLM will speak about their proposed venting policy, which they are currently shopping around the country in stakeholder meetings. Finally, the EPA (invited) representative will speak to the development and implementation of the policies in the recently released white papers on reduction of methane emissions pursuant to the President’s newest Climate Change policy.

We will also be sending all meeting registrants the seminar materials digitally prior to the event to print out. After the event, IPANM will have a link on our website much like we have for the ONRR issues.

In discussions with our Board members, this issue has been one of the most frustrating for operators. Don’t miss this workshop and find out that you later missed a deadline with the NMED or the EPA.

Registration Form

SLO Commissioner Ray Powell announce that on March 25th, his office enrolled an additional 150,000 acres in a Candidate Conservation Agreement with Assurances (CCAA). This brings the total enrolled acreage with the New Mexico State Land Office to 404,000 acres in the Lesser Prairie Chicken Area. Link to the letter.

In addition, effective May 12, 2014, the USFWS filed a final rule determining that the Lesser Prairie Chicken is a ‘threatened’ species. This is a link to the full 99 page rule for your reading pleasure. Using its authority under Rule 4(d), the agency decided that CCAA efforts under the Western Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies (WAFWA) were appropriate for management of the species. However, note Director Dan Ashe’s statement, “Working through the WAFWA range-wide conservation plan, the states remain in the driver’s seat for managing the species – more than has ever been done before – and participating landowners and developers are not impacted with additional regulatory requirements.” From a legal perspective, this means that operators who are not participating in the WAFWA CCAA scheme might not be “protected” and will have to do additional conservation efforts for the species.

However, on April 10, 2014, the Centers for Biological Diversity, WildEarth Guardians and Defenders of Wildlife filed a 60-day notice of intent to sue with the Department of Interior over violations of Sections 4 and 7 of the Endangered Species Act. They are effectively stating that enrollment and payment in any CCAAs should not be considered a valid exception to the Endangered Species Act. The outcome of this case could have significant impacts on both the Chicken and the Lizard CCAs and future listing decisions. Note that the Centers for Biological Diversity is the NGO that entered in the settlement agreement with the present Administration to force listing decisions for over 250 species by 2016. The Oklahoma Attorney General has filed suit on April 1, 2014 against the USFWS for entering into the settlement with the NGO.

So the net effect of the State Land Office listing is as follows:
1. Operators with leases prior to May 12, 2014 in the area enrolled by the Commissioner had to have enrolled their respective acreage with Center for Excellence for Hazardous Material Management by that date.
2. Acreage leased after May 12, 2014 may be enrolled and the Commissioner, while he cannot place conditions on the leases, will strongly encourage this ‘voluntary’ participation. As listed in the SLO letter, some measures of the CCAA include:
a. Exit ramps for open water sources
b. Minimizing surface disturbances
c. Avoiding Dunes Sagebrush habitat
d. Burying power lines within two miles of LPC lek sites active at least once in the past five years
e. Burying power lines within one mile of historic LPC lek sites.

Link to the full 99-page rule.

Last week, Congressman Pearce’s office drafted, and got the entire New Mexico delegation to sign, a letter to Secretary Sally Jewell regarding the new rotational BLM lease sale schedule. As noted by Congressman Pearce, the prior system of four sales per year did not pose any problems. Since over 31% of New Mexico budget comes from oil and gas revenues, it is imperative that leases continue to be offered so we can maintain the current levels of production in our state. A copy of the letter to Secretary Jewell is attached.

The rotational lease sale issue has been of great concern to IPANM and our membership. Please thank Congressman Pearce for listening to our concerns and for taking action.
Letter to DOI

On April 7th in the Federal Register, the USFWS filed a reopening of the comment period on the designation of critical habitat for the New Mexico Jumping Mouse. The proposed area would cover 14,560 acres in 29 different areas including Bernalillo, Colfax, Mora, Otero, Rio Arriba, Sandoval, and Socorro Counties and La Plata and Animas Counties of Colorado. I expect the area to increase significantly in size as the USFWS continues to be concerned about the species. The designation of critical habitat will require additional study and requirements by the Federal Government for any project on federal lands. As with both the Lesser Prairie Chicken and the Sand Dune Lizard, the first step towards either a threatened or endangered finding is designation of critical habitat.

Comments are due May 8th. The Federal Register notice.