A New Day at IPANM

 

 

information & issues

Welcome to IPANM’s Information & Issues webpage!

IPANM is not afraid to take strong stances on many current issues threatening our industry. We have to! Seemingly minor changes to regulations or rules can have a major impact on the financial solvency of our small oil & gas producers. While we will never compromise on our duties to protect human health, fresh water and the environment in our daily activities, we will fight unnecessary government overreach when new regulatory proposals are not based on sound science and do little to protect the environment.

Below, we’ve identified serious issues facing our producers. Please click on the corresponding button to learn more about each issue and IPANM’s stance on the issue. (Note: Some of this content may be restricted for members only. To access this exclusive content, please join our association!)

RECENT NEWS: All Issues

On April 15, 2015, ONRR published new Unbundling Cost Allocations (UCAs) for the San Juan Transportation System and the San
Tomorrow in the federal register, the BLM will be publishing an advanced notice of proposed rulemaking that will substantially impact
On March 20, 2015 the U.S. Department of the Interior released the new Hydraulic Fracturing Rule that will regulate hydraulic
On March 23rd, the NMOCD posted on its website a notice to all operators requesting information relating to wellbore(s) that
Last week, April 2nd, there was a meeting between several company representatives, the BLM and members of the New Mexico
The Mora County Commission voted unanimously to repeal the "Mora County Community Water and Local Self-Government Ordinance" on the grounds
On March 17, 2015 the Subcommittee on Conservation and Forestry of the US House of Representatives met to discuss the
Although we had hoped the preemption bill would go through the House floor this past weekend, there were some intervening
2015 Legislative Updates
Yesterday at the New Mexico Legislature, House Leader Nate Gentry introduced a bill (HB 366) on IPANM's behalf. HB 366

Please find below a message IPANM received from ONRR regarding updated information for several plants in the San Juan Basin. Please note that there is a pending rule for which we are intending to comment by the deadline of May 8th which will impact OIL producers including reducing the deductions available on POP contracts. We hope to have a summary of the rule out asap so that your companies can comment as well. In addition, I have been trying to get the ONRR to come to New Mexico to have a stakeholder meeting on the proposed rule, but have not had any luck yet. We will let you know if and when we can schedule a workshop on the ONRR issues.

From ONRR:

On April 15, 2015, ONRR published new Unbundling Cost Allocations (UCAs) for the San Juan Transportation System and the San Juan (Blanco) Plant for the years 2008-2014. ONRR also published new UCAs for the Torre Alta Transportation System and the Lybrook Plant for the year 2011. ONRR updated UCAs for the San Juan Transportation System and the Chaco Plant for the years 2008-2014. This update is due to the acquisition of more accurate information regarding this transportation system and gas plant. From this point forward, UCAs based on replacement cost will be rounded to the closest integer.
The new UCAs are available at the Office of Natural Resources Revenue (ONRR) website, onrr.gov/unbundling, and relate to the allowable portion of contractual transportation and processing fees.
If you have any questions, please direct your inquiries to onrrunbundling@onrr.gov.


This message serves as guidance for determining value for royalties and is not an appealable decision or order under 30 CFR Part 1290, Subpart B. If ONRR issues you an order to pay additional royalties or assesses civil penalties under 30 CFR Part 1241 at a later date based on this guidance, your appeal rights will be provided at that time. While this message is not appealable, ONRR may use this guidance in conducting audits and as a basis for demanding additional royalties.”
End message

Tomorrow in the federal register, the BLM will be publishing an advanced notice of proposed rulemaking that will substantially impact future leasing on federal lands. The BLM will be seeking industry input on several questions relating to changing the royalty rates for competitive leases, increasing annual rentals, increasing minimum bid amounts, increasing bonding and increasing civil penalty levels. Included in the notice will be a five page list of questions which I would urge you or your land departments to review. Below are the notice of proposed rulemaking and the five page list of questions.

The BLM will be asking for comment within 45 days of tomorrows publication.

Notice of Proposed Rulemaking

List of Questions

On March 20, 2015 the U.S. Department of the Interior released the new Hydraulic Fracturing Rule that will regulate hydraulic fracturing on public lands managed by the BLM. This will affect approximately 700 million acres of mineral estate underlying both federal and nonfederal lands and an additional 56 million acres of American Indian lands. The BLM estimates that the new well requirements would affect 3,800 oil and gas wells annually.

The new rule will expand the existing BLM regulations on oil and gas operations specified at 43 CFR § 3162.3-1 and Onshore Oil and Gas Orders 1, 2, and 7.

Summary by Baker Hostetler

On March 23rd, the NMOCD posted on its website a notice to all operators requesting information relating to wellbore(s) that have communicated with another wellbore(s) to the appropriate OCD office by April 22nd. The NMOCD states, “there has been evidence showing that inter-well communication and/or pressure increases may injure producing formations, injection intervals, casing or case seats and may create underground waste.” The request of the NMOCD requires all operators to give the agency information regarding “communication of any kind through drilling, completion, stimulation or production operations relating to both horizontal or vertical wells.” Reporting must be in accordance with 19.15.16.17 (C-103) and or 19.15.29 NMAC (on a C-141 form).

The NMOCD further states that “completion operators will be required to IMMEDIATELY report any instances of inter-well communication resulting from stimulation. Releases must be reported on a C-141 form while only pressure increases or decreases must be reported on a C-103 form.”

Affected operators must also IMMEDIATELY report any instances of inter-well communications on a C-141 form and they are also advised to contact the operator performing the stimulation.

Note that the NMOCD provides a “clarification” that “any fluid or gas released from an affected well will be considered a release. This includes but is not limited to, any mixture of completion and/or formation gases vented from the production equipment due to the inter-well communication.”

OCD Notice

Last week, April 2nd, there was a meeting between several company representatives, the BLM and members of the New Mexico Congressional delegation. The topic of the meeting was the potential merger of the New Mexico BLM and the Arizona BLM due to budget constraints. The Department of Interior is planning to move only the State Director from Arizona over to New Mexico to run the New Mexico office. Thus, the 12.2 million acres currently managed by the BLM will be added to the 13.5 million surface acres and 26 million subsurface acres already managed by the Santa Fe Office. It is also interesting to note that the Arizona office does not manage any oil and gas resources while the New Mexico office has the largest office in the country. As an IPANM member, it is important that our congressional delegation hears from us on this issue. Please consider contacting them.

In addition, today, the NM BLM announced that is has postponed the April 22, 2015 lease sale due to “priority workloads.” The 17 parcels totaling 3,295 acres from the Oklahoma Field Office will be added to the July 22, 2015 lease sale. This newest development is very concerning given the move to combine offices without a significant increase in personnel.

If you have any questions regarding the NM BLM lease sales, please contact Becky Hunt, Natural Resource Specialist at 505-954-2154 or rhunt@blm.gov.

Contacts for NM Congressional Offices –
Rep. Steve Pearce: 202-225- 2365
Rep. Michelle Lujan-Grisham: 202-225-6316
Rep. Ben Ray Lujan: 202-225-6190
Sen. Tom Udall: 202-225-6621
Sen. Martin Heinrich: 202-225-5521

The Mora County Commission voted unanimously to repeal the “Mora County Community Water and Local Self-Government Ordinance” on the grounds that Federal Judge Browning has found the ordinance invalid on Constitutional grounds. This is very good news and would not have been possible without the lawsuit filed by IPANM in November 2013 after passage of the original ordinance in April 2013.

This good news is also welcome in light of the recent demise of HB 366, drafted by IPANM and sponsored by Representative Gentry, House Majority leader. Rep. Gentry did a phenomenal job pushing the bill through two House Committees and across the House floor with a final 37-28 vote. Unfortunately, Senate Conservation Chairman Peter Wirth refused to hear the bill and it was left in their committee to die without a final vote. The same fate occurred with SB 421, drafted and sponsored by NMOGA. Paula Garcia, current chair of the Mora County Commission, testified strongly against both bills but also admitted that the Mora County Ordinance was not the “correct way” to limit oil and gas activities in the counties. We are pleased that Ms. Garcia followed through on her commitment to reverse Mora’s ordinance and hope that before that county adopts another ordinance, IPANM will be able to speak to the Commissioners.

I will be speaking at the Society of Petroleum Engineers luncheon in Farmington tomorrow and hope to send the final report on the session out by Tuesday afternoon. There are also several updates to send regarding BLM’s intent to merge the New Mexico and Arizona offices and IPANM’s request to ONRR for another training session in New Mexico this spring. We will keep you posted!

On March 17, 2015 the Subcommittee on Conservation and Forestry of the US House of Representatives met to discuss the impacts of the EPA’s proposal on expanding the definition of ‘Waters of the US’ (WOTUS). Last fall, IPANM submitted extensive comments on the proposed rule, arguing the US Supreme Court has already stated twice that the EPA and Army Corps have impermissibly expanded their regulatory authority and the proposed definitional change to WOTUS was just another substantial overreach. NM Congresswoman Lujan-Grisham provided opening remarks and invited our New Mexico Secretary of Agriculture, Jeff Witte to speak on behalf of our state and the National Association of State Departments of Agriculture. Mr. Witte testified that the EPA was substantially overreaching their authority with the new definition of WOTUS. Mr. Witte also cited the New Mexico Environment Department comments which also strongly opposed the EPA expanded Waters of the US definition. Every other witness before the Committee also asked the EPA to withdraw or re-propose the rule.

Today, EPA Administrator and the Army Corps of Engineers had a press conference to announce the introduction of the final rule and definition for ‘Waters of the US.” The press release is at:

http://yosemite.epa.gov/opa/admpress.nsf/0/62295CDDD6C6B45685257E52004FAC97. The final rule has not been published in the federal register yet, but it will be final within 60 days from today or tomorrow. The preamble to the rule is 299 pages and is available on the EPA website but the key document is the actual regulation defining WOTUS which is at: http://www2.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2015-05/documents/clean_water_rule_part_230_3_1.pdf Note that this document is a prepublication document to the one that will be posted in the federal register tonight or tomorrow.

Of note in the new definition, ephemeral washes or temporary ditches are not considered WOTUS, nor are manmade pools or holding ponds or wastewater recycling facilities. The EPA also ‘clarified’ definitions of adjacent and tributary. It is expected that both the agricultural industry and the oil and gas industry will take a hard look at this new rule to determine whether litigation is needed.

Although we had hoped the preemption bill would go through the House floor this past weekend, there were some intervening issues which delayed the debate until later this week. When it is on the House floor I would encourage you to listen in via webcasting which you can access on www.nmlegis.gov.

Tomorrow afternoon SB421 will be heard in the Senate Conservation Committee. This bill will amend the zoning authority of both counties and municipalities to prohibit them from having any ordinances concerning oil and gas, mining or agricultural issues. This bill is different from the IPANM bill HB 366, which clarifies that the NMOCD is the only authority to regulate conservation, extraction, processing and storage of oil and gas. Our bill still allows for zoning authority in areas other than those listed. If you have the time I would encourage you to listen in via webcast as well.

Preemption is an issue that is of primary concern to IPANM and we will support Senator Ingle’s bill in the Conservation Committee tomorrow.

Yesterday at the New Mexico Legislature, House Leader Nate Gentry introduced a bill (HB 366) on IPANM’s behalf. HB 366 seeks to clarify the jurisdiction of the NMOCD as the primarily regulatory authority over the extraction, production, drilling, completion operations, transportation and processing of oil and natural gas in New Mexico. This bill is vitally important in the discussion with counties and their authority to regulate our industry. The language and intent of the IPANM bill have been carefully crafted to follow the recent decision in the SWEPI v. Mora case wherein Federal District Judge Browning held there is conflict preemption between the laws establishing NMOCD’s authority and Mora County’s desire to ban all oil and gas operations. However, he also stated that because the NMOCD does not regulate all issues that might arise regarding an oil and gas operation, such as noise, dust or neighbor nuisance complaints, that the state cannot have express jurisdiction over all oil and gas operations. Thus, it is the goal of HB 366 to express the intent of the legislature that the state is the sole regulatory body over a specific list of oil and gas activities including siting, drilling, completion, production, processing and transportation thereby preempting counties, municipalities or other political subdivisions from regulating in those specific areas. HB 366 is a necessary and substantial clarification from the existing law which gives the NMOCD the authority over the conservation of oil and gas and the prevention of waste. The bill was referred to House Energy and House Judiciary. We hope to see the bill in committee within the next week or so.
HB 366