A New Day at IPANM

 

 

information & issues

Welcome to IPANM’s Information & Issues webpage!

IPANM is not afraid to take strong stances on many current issues threatening our industry. We have to! Seemingly minor changes to regulations or rules can have a major impact on the financial solvency of our small oil & gas producers. While we will never compromise on our duties to protect human health, fresh water and the environment in our daily activities, we will fight unnecessary government overreach when new regulatory proposals are not based on sound science and do little to protect the environment.

Below, we’ve identified serious issues facing our producers. Please click on the corresponding button to learn more about each issue and IPANM’s stance on the issue. (Note: Some of this content may be restricted for members only. To access this exclusive content, please join our association!)

RECENT NEWS: All Issues

Last week the SLO Staff presented an excellent workshop. The topics of discussion included units industry training; State Land Office
Click here for he FINAL rule from EPA on the NSPS subpart OOOO. Also available is the DRAFT GCP-6 document
Today, September 23rd, the Office of Natural Resources Revenue Asset Valuation Unbundling Team (AVUT) updated the Unbundling Cost Allocations for
Today, the New Mexico Environment Department announced that on Monday Sept 23rd, they will be holding a public comment period
Please find below a link to a Federal Register notice that was just brought to our attention. Our friends at
New Source Performance Standard SubPart 0000 of the Clean Air Act Review of New Sources and Modifications in Indian Country--Rule
If your company is intending to ask the EPA or an extension to use best available reporting methods (BAMM) under
Contact information for the experts who made presentations at the IPANM ONRR Training on June 24, 2013 and contact information
Presentations given by the experts at the IPANM ONRR Training on June 24, 2013 and presentations given by the government
The ONRR unbundling team has released the following notice regarding UCAs for the Val Verde Transportation System and Treatment Plant.

Last week the SLO Staff presented an excellent workshop. The topics of discussion included units industry training; State Land Office 101; miscellaneous instruments; nomination of parcels; rentals, cancellations and expirations; oil stripper well rate royalty reduction program; new leases and assignments and Oil and Gas remitter identification. There are power points for each subject matter on the State Land office website at :

If you have any questions, please contact Greg Bloom, Deputy Commissioner for Oil and Gas at gbloom@slo.state.nm.us.
Karin Foster

A few takeaways:

1. The State Land Office is looking to do a land swap with the BLM in the Prairie Chicken Area. The exact amount of acreage is unclear, however, it looks like 15,000 acres will be swapped. A remaining 50,000 acres will also be ‘enrolled’ by the SLO which means that when that tract goes to bid the lessee will be encouraged to sign a Conservation Agreement with Assurances with the BLM/USFWS for the Lizard and Chicken. Apparently, the sign up of these leases will occur even after the potential listing date of the Chicken since these lands are ‘enrolled’ by the SLO.

2. The SLO intends to roll out a mobile site within the next few weeks.

3. Tract nominations – the company nominating leases MUST appear at the lease sale when that tract is offered; to bid a party must have an OGRID number and the Deadline for nomination is two fridays before the sale before the lease sale of the tract (or at least 6 weeks)

4. OGRID numbers: Please make sure you submit change of address forms and include current phone numbers of currently employed contacts. This has been a problem for the agency. Note that if your OGRID address does not match your royalty check payments, the check will NOT be deposited and it will be returned.

5. Please make sure your company files the necessary paperwork disclosing composition of Hydraulic Fracturing fluids used with the OCD within 45 days of completion of a well.

Click here for he FINAL rule from EPA on the NSPS subpart OOOO.

Also available is the DRAFT GCP-6 document (expect a revised document to be released soon)

Handouts from the NMED open house on the GCP-6 issue held on Sept 23rd. Note the very short deadline under subpart OOOO for determining emissions for Group 1 sources.

Overview: Please note, this is based on my read of the new regulation.

1. This final rule affects all oil and gas producers under NAICS code 211111.

2. A facility under this rule is a single storage vessel located in the oil and gas production segment… that has the potential for VOC emissions equal to or greater than 6 tons per year (TPY) as determined by October 15, 2013. This rule only applies to vessels containing crude oil, condensate, intermediate hydrocarbon liquids or produced water.

3. The potential for VOC emissions must be calculated using a generally accepted model based on the maximum average daily throughput determined for a 30 day period of production prior to the applicable emissions determination deadline (October 15, 2013 for Group 1 wells – see below)

4. Note instead of modeling and implementing the 95% emissions reductions processes, an operator may comply with this provision if he can substantiate an uncontrolled actual VOC emission rate of less than 4 tpy based on records of 12 months immediately preceding the demonstration date. If the monthly testing requirement shows a rate of 4 tpy or more, the operator would have 30 days to meet the 95% control requirement unless the increase was associated with fracturing or refracturing of a well feeding the storage vessel affected facility. In that case, the 95% control would be required as soon as the liquids are routed from the fractured well to the storage vessel.

5. A storage vessel affected facility that subsequently has VOC emissions decrease below the 6 tpy threshold shall remain an affected facility under OOOO.

6. For storage vessels constructed, reconstucted or modified after August 23, 2011 and before April 12, 2013,(Group 1) the final rule requires that owner/operators estimate emissions from the storage vessels to determine if an affected facility no later than October 15, 2013, and a notification must be submitted with the facility annual report due by January 15, 2014. These same facilities must install equipment to comply with the 95% emissions reduction standards with a compliance deadline of April 15, 2014. Note that these facilities do not need to track emission increase events, as previously proposed.
7. For storage vessels constructed after April 12, 2013, the final compliance date for the 95% emissions reductions is April 15, 2014 (or 60 days after startup, whichever is later).

8. BUT see section 60.5365(h)(4) “A gas well facility initially constructed after August 23, 2011 is considered an affected facility”. This provision seems to ignore the 6tpy limitation… I will get clarification on this..

Please note that the General Construction Permit 6 (GCP-6) released by the New Mexico Environment on Sept. 20th for public comment, is trying to provide a viable alternative to meeting the requirements of OOOO. This permit was sent to you last friday by IPANM. Note that the NMED permit is not final and it is currently being revised to consider industry comments made last weekend and by industry members who attended the NMED meetings. I will inform our membership of any training opportunities and clarification of the document as soon as I get the information.

I have had long conversations with Secretary Flynn of the NMED regarding this issue. He assures me that NMED is working with industry on this issue. I have been assured by staff that training sessions particularly for smaller producers are being considered by the department.

Today, September 23rd, the Office of Natural Resources Revenue Asset Valuation Unbundling Team (AVUT) updated the Unbundling Cost Allocations for the San Juan Conventional Transportation System and the Ignacio Processing plant. These new numbers are for royalties reporting for these named plants for 2006-2010. The AVUT also calculated new Transportation UCA’s for the Otero, Lybrook and Buena Suerte Transportation systems. New Processing USA’s were published for the Huerfano Gas Plant for royalties reported from 2007 to July 2013. In order to assist operators, the AVUT has placed 4 additional documents relating to unbundling Transportation Systems and Processing Plants on the ONRR Website at onrr.gov/unbundling/methodology. I have attached the four documents to this email and they will also be on our website at ipanm.org.

Please note the following language from the ONRR website. This is their disclaimer:

“ONRR provides the UCAs on this website based on the best information available to ONRR at the time of publication. If ONRR receives more accurate information, then ONRR will update and modify the UCAs. You may use these UCAs as estimates for later time periods until such time as ONRR provides updated information. When ONRR updates or modifies information you may be subject to additional royalty obligations, or a credit, and associated interest under the provisions at 30 CFR §§ 1206.156(d) (for transportation allowances) and 1206.158(e) (for processing allowances). When ONRR updates the UCAs for a specific year you should adjust previously submitted royalty lines only for that specific year. Do not change previously reported data until ONRR publishes actual values. You should use the most recent UCAs as estimates for future reporting months.”
I have added emphasis to certain words here because this statement is unclear and yet the agency continues to believe operators will be able to comply with their unbundling enforcement efforts. IPANM is working closely with Senator Udall’s office to try to remedy the situation. Please consider contacting Jonathan Black at the Senator’s office via email or a letter to describe to him how difficult it is to comply with the ONRR unbundling theory. Jonathan’s email address is : Jonathan_Black@tomudall.senate.gov.

UCA-Calculations: accounting-and-contract-data-needs.pdf (79 kb)
UCA-Calucations: engineering-data-needs.pdf (75 kb)
How to Calculate a Processing – UCA.pdf (439 kb)
How to Calculate a Transportation UCA.pdf (402kb)
Disclaimer ONRR website 092313.pdf

Today, the New Mexico Environment Department announced that on Monday Sept 23rd, they will be holding a public comment period wherein members of the oil and gas industry will be able to comment on the New General Construction Permit process for Oil and Gas storage Vessels. The proposed GCP-6 permit is attached to this email as well.
Please see the press release from Sept 19th below:

New Mexico Air Quality Bureau Hosting Open House On New General Construction Permit for Storage Vessels

Santa Fe, NM — The New Mexico Environment Department Air Quality Bureau (AQB) is developing a new General Construction Permit (GCP-6) for storage vessels used in the oil and gas industry. The AQB will host informal open houses next week to receive public comment and answer questions on the development of the GCP-6. The open house will be held on September 23, 2013 from 11:00AM to 2:00PM at the following locations:

NMED Air Quality Bureau
525 Camino de los Marquez, Suite 1A Santa Fe, New Mexico 87505

NMED District II Field Office 3400 Messina Drive, Room 105 Farmington, NM 87402

NMED District III Field Office 1914 W. Second Street, Roswell, NM 88201

The GCP-6 is a completely voluntary permit for the oil and gas industry to register new storage vessels. The storage vessels that would be registered under the permit typically do not require an air permit to operate. This permit was developed in response to a new federal regulation which requires the regulated community to install control devices on new storage vessels.
The draft GCP-6 may be viewed during regular business hours at the NMED Air Quality Bureau office, 525 Camino de los Marquez Suite 1, Santa Fe, New Mexico 87505. The draft GCP-6 is available by contacting Kathy Primm at (505) 476-5561 or Kathleen.Primm@state.nm.us, and the draft GCP-6 is posted on AQB’s website at:

www.nmenv.state.nm.us/aqb/permit/aqb_draft_permits.html.

Please find below a link to a Federal Register notice that was just brought to our attention. Our friends at the Office of Natural Resource Revenue, specifically Sarah Inderbitzen, are trying to change the method of service of notices to your companies. We know that often they date their ‘Dear Reporter’ letters and we do not receive them until several weeks later (e.g., The August 8 ‘Dear Reporter’ letter received by most companies on September 6th by regular mail).

This Federal Register notice is a “final rule” stating that the Agency may now use “(4) Any electronic method of delivery that keeps information secure and provides for a receipt of delivery or, if there is no receipt, the date of delivery otherwise documented.” This means that an email with a date may be sent to some random person at your company and that notice could get caught in a spam filter, or worse, if that person has left your employ, the notice will remain in their inbox. This could have devastating and very expensive repercussions on your company–particularly with the Enforcement Division threatening penalties of up to $25,000 per day, per violation. At the IPANM presentation, Ms. Inderbitzen made it very clear that if your company has received the notice and you do nothing to respond or address the situation with ONRR, you will face ‘knowing and willful’ penalties. It is completely foreseeable that the electronic service provision of this proposed rule will cause lapses in response to the agency.

If we file ‘adverse comments’ on the Federal Register by September 23rd, the notice states that they will withdraw this rule. Please read this notice and file something electronically on the federal register site.

The link to file is:
https://www.federalregister.gov/articles/2013/08/23/2013-20634/amendments-to-onrrs-service-of-official-correspondence.

Tthe FR notice is at the above link. The most expeditious way to file comments is at www.federalregister.gov on the correct page (link above). And, you will receive a receipt stating the government received your comments.

This is very important, please file comments today. IPANM will also file comments on Friday. It is also my hope that members of the Congressional delegation will also weigh in on this issue.

Thank you,
Karin V. Foster

New Source Performance Standard SubPart 0000 of the Clean Air Act
Review of New Sources and Modifications in Indian Country–Rule Highlights

If your company is intending to ask the EPA or an extension to use best available reporting methods (BAMM) under Sub Part W, that filing is due March 30th. You should have filed the NOI to do so by January 3rd in addition to having registered for the e-GGRT tool. A generic letter that you intend to use BAMM for reporting all sources from your well sites should be sufficient. However, be careful about wanting to use only the EPA tool for emissions reporting. I am hearing that BAMM formula is so expansive that almost everyone will be pulled into the 25,000 mt threshold. In fact, some operators have noted that as few as 14 wells in one basin will trigger reporting requirements. Also, the March 30th BAMM extension will only allow you to delay reporting to June 30th anyway.

If you did not file the NOI and therefore are not eligible for the BAMM extension, your company will need to file the whole application.

http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2011-12-23/pdf/2011-31532.pdf Final rule SubPart A and W changes.

Also note that there will be an announcement on April 9th by the EPA as to which data elements reported under subpart W of Part 98 will be entities to confidential treatment under the Clean Air Act.

Click the link below for contact information for the experts who made presentations at the IPANM ONRR Training on June 24, 2013.
Expert Contact Information

Click the link below for contact information for the government representatives who made presentations at the IPANM ONRR Training on June 25, 2013.
Government Contact Information

Click on the link below for the presentations given by the experts at the IPANM ONRR Training on June 24, 2013.
Industry Expert Presentations

Click on the link below for the presentations given by the government representatives at the IPANM ONRR Training on June 25, 2013.
Government Presentations

July 2, 2013: ONRR UBT Updates Values;
The ONRR unbundling team has released the following notice regarding UCAs for the Val Verde Transportation System and Treatment Plant. As per our workshop discussion (IPANM ONRR Training, June 24-25, 2013), it would appear that any claims made between 2006 and 2010 will now need to be reversed and rebooked with the new numbers unless you have information in your files demonstrating a good faith basis for the deductibility percentages you used.

“On July 2nd, 2013, the Asset Valuation Unbundling Team (AVUT) updated the Unbundling Cost Allocations (UCAs) for the Val Verde Transportation System and Treatment Plant for calendar years 2006 through 2010. AVUT updated these values because the team received more accurate information concerning Val Verde. These UCAs are available at the Office of Natural Resources Revenue (ONRR) website, onrr.gov/unbundling, and relate to the allowable portion of contractual transportation and processing fees. AVUT modified all values for Val Verde with the exception of the Processing UCAs. AVUT added a new set of values to distinguish between the El Paso andTranswestern mainlines. If you need to see previously published values, or have any questions, please direct these inquiries to onrrunbundling@onrr.gov.”

June 28, 2013: ONRR Publishes Changes to Regulations;
Most notable is the removal of the definition for RIK from the regulations. In addition, the Department changed the timing of the determination of transportation allowances to give them more flexibility.

§ 1206.57 Determination of transportation allowances
*** * *?(c) * * *?(3) ONNR may establish reporting
dates for individual lessees different from those specified in this subpart in order to provide more effective administration. * * *
*** * *?[FR Doc. 2013–15691 Filed 6–27–13; 8:45 am]

Pertinent Language
Federal Register