A New Day at IPANM

 

 

information & issues

Welcome to IPANM’s Information & Issues webpage!

IPANM is not afraid to take strong stances on many current issues threatening our industry. We have to! Seemingly minor changes to regulations or rules can have a major impact on the financial solvency of our small oil & gas producers. While we will never compromise on our duties to protect human health, fresh water and the environment in our daily activities, we will fight unnecessary government overreach when new regulatory proposals are not based on sound science and do little to protect the environment.

Below, we’ve identified serious issues facing our producers. Please click on the corresponding button to learn more about each issue and IPANM’s stance on the issue. (Note: Some of this content may be restricted for members only. To access this exclusive content, please join our association!)

RECENT NEWS: All Issues

ENERGYWIRE (June 5, 2026)  Three months after the war in Iran sent crude prices soaring, oil producers in the biggest
Last week, something big happened in the U.S. oil and gas industry. In southeastern New Mexico, the federal government held
Beatty & Wozniak (May 28, 2026) - When it comes to produced water use and reuse, Texas and New Mexico
A group of Republican lawmakers is jointly introducing legislation in both the House and Senate aimed at easing air pollution
U.S. Department of the Interior (DOI)  May 20, 2026 - The US DOI generated over $4 billion in total receipts
Federal Reserve (May 12, 2026) - The conflict in Iran that erupted in late February represents one of the largest
IPANM   Carlsbad, NM (May 4, 2026 since updated May 11, 2026) - The Independent Petroleum Association of New Mexico (IPANM)
After significant developments this week that included the signage of HB80 and the filing of an enviro group lawsuit against
IPANM (March 11, 2026) - On the heels of the good news of the signage of HB80 on Monday, today
IPANM (March 11, 2026) - HB80 Oil & Gas Conservation Tax Act Changes, a bill that was first authored by IPANM

ENERGYWIRE (June 5, 2026)  Three months after the war in Iran sent crude prices soaring, oil producers in the biggest U.S. oil field are starting to ramp up their production.

The catch: The new push may only boost production by about 250,000 barrels a day, too little to lower the price of oil or provide relief for drivers.

Independent drillers have begun adding rigs in the Permian Basin, albeit slowly, according to the data analysis firm Enverus. And the same companies are working through a backlog of wells that can be brought online quickly.

The trends show that producers expect high oil prices to last into 2027 because it will take that long for the new wells to come online. And the volume of oil expected from the new activity isn’t likely to bring them down.

“It does not move the needle in the greater scheme of things,” Alex Ljubojevic, a lead supply analyst at Enverus, said in an interview.

As recently as January, benchmark U.S. oil was trading below $60 a barrel and companies were shutting down rigs and slowing production. Permian Basin rigs dropped from a high of 257 last June to 221 on Jan. 1, according to Enverus data.

When the U.S. began bombing Iran in February, sending crude prices above $90 a barrel, producers were cautious about drilling new wells because they were concerned that the price increase wouldn’t last. Independent producers, particularly shale drillers in the Permian Basin, are typically willing to take on more risk than major oil companies.

The price of oil has traded above $90 a barrel this week as sporadic violence continued in Iran and other Persian Gulf nations.

Some small operators in the Permian Basin have opted to finish off what the industry calls drilled but uncompleted wells (DUCs) that haven’t been hydraulically fractured, because it brings on production faster than new drilling, said Kirk Edwards, president of Latigo Petroleum in Odessa, Texas, and a former chair of the Permian Basin Petroleum Association.

“It’s a definite interim strategy,” Edwards said in an interview. “They’re trying to accelerate their return on investment with these $90–$100 oil prices, so they’re trying to get as much oil, everybody is trying to get as much oil in the market as they can right now, to take advantage of these prices.”

Diamondback Energy, a shale producer based in Midland, Texas, has 73 unfracked wells as of April 2026, the most among independent producers, according to data analytic firm Rystad Energy. Diamondback announced in May that it will deploy five fracking crews to complete some of them.

“This level of incremental activity maintains our current level of capital efficiency and puts Diamondback in a differentiated position,” CEO Kaes Van’t Hof said in a letter to stockholders.

The number of drilling rigs in the Permian Basin has been climbing, too, hitting 245 in May, according to Enverus. The number dropped to 240 this week.

Some operators in the Permian are also looking for new places to drill. A group of independent shale producers obtained 761 new drill permits in the first quarter of 2026, up from 514 in the last quarter of 2025, according to Rystad.

Among gas-focused producers, some independent companies are not expanding operations due to low gas prices, said Michael Banschbach, an oil and natural gas marketing consultant. Gas prices at the benchmark Henry Hubhave stayed below $3.50 per million British thermal units most of this year, despite the war in the Middle East.

“These producers don’t have a lot of oil, so with this gas it’s an easy decision for them to shut down,” he said.

One of the reasons the rig count — and by extension, oil production — isn’t growing faster is the way the Permian Basin has changed in the last decade.

Major oil producers like Exxon Mobil and Chevron have bought many of the independent companies that helped develop shale drilling, and they’re more cautious about ramping up production when prices rise.

The majors control about 70 percent of the best drilling locations in the basin, Enverus estimated in April. And although they expect their production to rise, large companies can take a long-term view about price trends.

“It’s very early to, I think, have a high degree of confidence in terms of how this all plays out,” Chevron CEO Mike Wirth said on a May 2 call with analysts.

Last week, something big happened in the U.S. oil and gas industry. In southeastern New Mexico, the federal government held the largest onshore oil and natural gas lease sale in American history. It generated more than $4 billion — more than four times the previous record.

Last week’s lease sale in southeastern New Mexico shattered records. It raised about $4 billion. That’s more than four times the amount of the previous record for an onshore sale.

The sale also broke the record for the highest bid for a single lease — $405.8 million for just one lease in Lea County.

First, what is a lease sale?

A lease sale is how the federal government rents out the right to explore and drill for oil and natural gas beneath public land.

In a lease sale, the government auctions off leases for parcels of land to energy companies. The winning bidder pays an upfront amount for the lease, and then — if they successfully find and produce oil or gas — they pay the government an ongoing percentage of the value (royalty) of everything they produce. Land is temporarily leased, not sold, during a lease sale. The government retains ownership of the land.

What changed that made this lease sale so big?

A key federal policy change included in last year’s One Big Beautiful Bill (OBBB) Act was the difference-maker. This policy change improved the quality of the land offered for leasing.

The acreage in this sale sits in southeastern New Mexico, over both the Delaware Basin and the Permian Basin (big shale formations that are known to produce oil and gas). The government had designated the land eligible for oil and gas leasing years ago, but it hadn’t been included in previous lease sales. There was a disconnect between where industry geologists believed oil and gas would be best produced, and which parcels the government chose to offer.

But the OBBB Act changed how the government selects parcels of land for leasing. It stipulated that at least 50% of the parcels of land offered in lease sales must be lands that were actually nominated by interested companies.

So why did bidding climb so high? Drilling on neighboring land had already shown that the area was highly likely to produce oil and gas. Producers nominated these parcels for the lease sale because they had high confidence in their potential to produce. And because of the policy change in the OBBB Act, those high-confidence parcels of land were certain to be included in the auction.

The policy change meant that this was some of the lowest-risk acreage the industry had seen in years.

What does this historic lease sale say about the future of energy demand?

For any investment, demand matters. And when it comes to energy, demand is projected to grow.

Global energy markets remain tight following disruption in the Strait of Hormuz. At the same time, new technologies like artificial intelligence, data centers, advanced manufacturing and rising global living standards will require more energy, not less, and oil and natural gas will play a critical role in supplying it.

Why should Americans care about lease sales?

The money raised by lease sales flows back to taxpayers. In 2025, energy production on federal and tribal onshore lands, and federal offshore areas generated a whopping $14.6 billion in revenue.

For onshore leases, revenue is split between the federal government and the state where the land sits. In the case of last week’s sale, New Mexico. The rest goes to the U.S. Treasury and a federal fund for Western water projects.

In New Mexico, the money raised by federal and state leases is a big piece of the state’s budget — it pays for things like public schools, healthcare and infrastructure without raising taxes. Oil and gas revenue underwrites the state’s Early Childhood Education and Care Fund, which makes childcare free for New Mexico families.

The key takeaway

The broader lesson is that policy matters. In this case, a seemingly small policy change created big benefits for the country in the form of revenue, jobs and energy security.

Amid the current global energy disruption and looking at long-term rising energy demand, federal and state policy has an outsized impact in determining whether the United States will be able to deliver the energy we need to build our future. And as last week’s lease sale demonstrated, even relatively small changes can create big benefits.

 

https://ipanm.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/MEDIA-ARTICLE-An-Antomy-of-a-Lease-Sale.pdf

Beatty & Wozniak (May 28, 2026) – When it comes to produced water use and reuse, Texas and New Mexico are on the same road but at very different mileposts. Texas is drafting permit mechanics for the land application of treated produced water. New Mexico is still deciding whether to authorize broader off-oilfield reuse at all. Operators, midstream water companies, data center developers, hydrogen and geothermal sponsors, and industrial users with Permian or San Juan Basin exposure should plan around the gap—not around an eventual convergence.

At a glance:

  • Texas (TCEQ): On April 30, 2026, the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) approved publication of proposed rules under Rule Project No. 2026-006-309-OW implementing Senate Bill (SB) 1145. Comment period closes June 16, 2026; adoption targeted 2027.
  • Texas Supreme Court (2025): Produced water is oil and gas waste owned by the mineral operator, not the surface owner, absent express agreement. Cactus Water Services, LLC v. COG Operating, LLC.
  • New Mexico (WQCC): On May 12, 2026, the Water Quality Control Commission (WQCC) voted 7-4 to advance WQCC 26-18, reopening 20.6.8 NMAC for off-oilfield reuse. Hearing to be scheduled; decision anticipated in 2027.
  • New Mexico—current rule: Existing 20.6.8 NMAC generally prohibits discharge of untreated or treated produced water to surface water or groundwater outside of oil-and-gas activities, while allowing limited pilot projects under New Mexico Environment Department (NMED) permitting.
  • Commercial takeaway: A reuse project that may be moving toward a permit pathway in Texas may remain legally uncertain in New Mexico. Multi-state projects should be structured by source state, treatment location, transport route, discharge or land-application location, end use, and contract risk allocation.

More information:

A group of Republican lawmakers is jointly introducing legislation in both the House and Senate aimed at easing air pollution regulations for small oil and gas companies.

The bicameral legislation, obtained exclusively by the Washington Examiner, would soften Clean Air Act rules for the oil and gas industry, marking the latest effort from Congress to deliver on President Donald Trump’s call to “drill, baby, drill,” while also propping up the administration’s broader deregulatory agenda.

The bills, both called the Protect Domestic Oil and Gas Small Business Act of 2026, are expected to be introduced in the House and Senate on Thursday by Rep. August Pfluger (R-TX) and Sen. Cynthia Lummis (R-WY).

If passed, the legislation would amend the Clean Air Act to exempt small oil and gas producers from Environmental Protection Agency performance standards required under Section 111 of the law, including requirements for monitoring, reporting, detecting, and repairing leaks of greenhouse gases such as methane.

This would only apply to “marginal wells,” meaning an oil well site that has an average daily production of 15 barrels of oil or oil equivalent per day per well or less. For natural gas, a site must have an average daily production per well of 90,000 cubic feet or less to qualify for the exemption.

U.S. Department of the Interior (DOI)  May 20, 2026 – The US DOI generated over $4 billion in total receipts from a Bureau of Land Management oil and gas lease sale in New Mexico and Texas, underscoring strong industry demand for domestic energy development on public lands.

The Bureau of Land Management leased 74 parcels totaling 33,530 acres during the quarterly lease sale. Combined bonus bids and rental payments from the sale totaled approximately $4,007,944,870. Revenue generated through lease sales is shared between the federal government and the states where the parcels are located.

“America is sitting on some of the richest energy resources in the world, and President Donald J. Trump is committed to putting those resources to work for the American people,” said Secretary of the Interior Doug Burgum. “This over $4 billion lease sale is another sign that President Trump’s American Energy Dominance Agenda is delivering results. By cutting costs and removing barriers to development, we are unleashing American energy, strengthening national security, creating jobs and generating significant revenue for taxpayers and local communities.”

The sale was conducted under the Working Families Tax Cuts Act, which lowered the federal royalty rate for new onshore oil and gas production to 12.5%, reversing the 16.67% rate established under the Inflation Reduction Act. The lower royalty rate reduces costs for energy producers operating on public lands and is expected to encourage additional investment, leasing and drilling activity across the West. Oil and gas lease sales support reliable domestic energy production, strengthen American energy independence and help ensure the United States remains a global energy leader. Increased production on federal lands also supports manufacturing, transportation and national defense while helping stabilize energy costs for American families and businesses.

Consistent with Executive Order 14154, “Unleashing American Energy,” the Department of the Interior and Bureau of Land Management continue to support responsible energy development on public lands while ensuring projects comply with the National Environmental Policy Act and other applicable laws. Leasing is the first step in the process to develop federal oil and gas resources. Oil and gas leases are issued for a term of 10 years and continue as long as oil and gas are produced in paying quantities.

Additional information on current and upcoming lease sales is available through the National Fluid Lease Sale System.

See the official DOI News Release

Federal Reserve (May 12, 2026) – The conflict in Iran that erupted in late February represents one of the largest global energy shocks in decades. The Strait of Hormuz—a key shipping channel for energy trade—remains closed as of April 2026, disrupting roughly 20 percent of global oil trade flows and leading domestic oil prices to jump by roughly 60 percent since late February. Although global energy inventories and excess oil supply leading into the conflict have kept prices from moving even higher, these buffers have limitations. Moreover, while oil futures prices currently remain subdued, both futures and spot oil prices could move higher if the disruption to energy transportation and production persists.

Although this energy shock poses challenges for consumers and businesses nationwide, it will likely generate greater severance tax revenue for Rocky Mountain states, which are relatively large energy producers. In this edition of the Rocky Mountain Economist, we summarize the characteristics of the recent Middle Eastern energy shock, outline how current circumstances differ from the recent past, and highlight the implications for severance tax revenues in Rocky Mountain states.

Iran Conflict and Energy Shock

In late February, joint U.S.-Israeli strikes on Iran and the subsequent retaliation disrupted major energy trade routes, curtailing available energy to global markets. Chart 1 shows that vessel traffic through the Strait of Hormuz—a thoroughfare for more than 20 percent of global oil and petroleum products—dropped by more than 90 percent between February and April 2026 (EIA 2025).

More

 

This content is for members only.

Please login here! If you have any questions about your membership, please email megan@ipanm.org.

After significant developments this week that included the signage of HB80 and the filing of an enviro group lawsuit against the Oil Conservation Division, IPANM has joined with the New Mexico Oil & Gas Assocciation to file a joint Expedited Motion To ReOpen the Western Environmental Law Center’s (WELC) Bonding Rulemaking Hearing.

The motion, filed Friday, reads that IPANM and NMOGA “respectfully move the Commission to reopen the evidentiary record in Case No. 24683 for the limited purpose of supplementing the record to consider the implications of House Bill 80 (“HB 80”), and a new lawsuit filed by a Co-Applicant to this rulemaking against the State, both of which were enacted and filed this week on March 9, 2026, and to allow limited supplemental briefing by the parties on their impact on the Proposed Rules.”

Click Here: IPANM & NMOGA’s Expedited Motion To ReOpen WELC

Industry’s legal arguments for reopening make it clear that the circumstances have changed due to the signing of HB80. In essence, the core argument by WELC and the OCD for increased bonding was due to limited funding to address orphan well liability. However, with the Reclamation Fund set to receive a potential $1.2 billion dollar infusion over the next 10 years, the funding shortage no longer exists. Industry is also citing Monday’s lawsuit filed by the San Juan Citizen’s Alliance (a party to the WELC Bonding Rulemaking) against the state (regarding orphan well remediation), as evidence that the proposed rules are unsound.

IPANM and NMOGA have indicated to all parties that the Expedited Motion to ReOpen is NOT a tactic to obstruct the rulemaking. IPANM and NMOGA have indicated that industry does not intend to reopen every issue presented at the Oct-Nov 2025 hearing, nor does industry wish to backtrack on post-Hearing All-Party discussions, including a Joint Stipulation agreement that was finalized last week. However, IPANM and NMOGA do intend submit limited evidence on the impact of HB80 and related developments that impact a new bonding rule.

In a late development on Friday afternoon, the San Juan Citizen’s Alliance (SJCA) withdrew from the WELC environmental groups’ consortium.

IPANM (March 11, 2026) – On the heels of the good news of the signage of HB80 on Monday, today Governor Michelle Lujan Grisham signed SB151 Omnibus Tax Package despite continued opposition from IPANM and the business community.

In fact, industry (including IPANM) lobbied not once, but twice in the past week alone (in addition to repeated stated opposition during the 2026 session) to urge the Governor to NOT sign SB151.

The bill signing is a loss for the the state and the business community, further making it less attractive to do business in New Mexico.

SB151 Omnibus Tax Package is a complex bill. The bill “decouples” the state from Trump’s Big Beautiful Bill corporate tax cut rates. A brief summary is available, but member companies will have varying impacts, and it will be up to those individual companies to further determine how this signed bill will impact them.

Further analysis of the impacts can be found at the Tax Foundation Summary and the New Mexico Tax Research Institute’s most recent newsletter,  The Governor’s office puts her spin on the signing in this news release.

Governor Signs SB151; “DeCoupling” Tax Increase Forthcoming