A New Day at IPANM

 

 

Newsroom

IPANM (Sept. 19, 2025) - Today, IPANM filed all of its witness rebuttal testimony to the Oil Conservation Commission regarding
IPANM (Sept. 15, 2025) IPANM and NMOGA have filed a motion to dismiss the entire WELC Rulemaking Hearing regarding new
FNREL (Sept. 4, 2025) - The Foundation for Natural Resources and Energy Law has asked IPANM to announce some upcoming
IPANM (August 8, 2025) - IPANM filed all of its witness testimony to the Oil Conservation Commission regarding Western Environmental
IPANM (June 25, 2025) – On Tuesday, June 25, 2025, the non-partisan New Mexico Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) released this
By Missi Currier | CEO, New Mexico Oil & Gas Association When it comes to environmental responsibility, New Mexico’s oil
New York Post (June 12, 2025) WASHINGTON — The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing the removal of Biden administration greenhouse gas regulations
Power The Future (May 30, 2025) Washington, D.C. - American oil production set a new record of 13.488 million barrels
Oil & Gas Investor (June 25, 2025) OKLAHOMA CITY—The tangled regulatory web in New Mexico is “a nightmare,” a Dallas-based
Central Texas News (April 22, 2025) - By The Empowerment Alliance How far will green energy proponents go to push

MEMBERS ONLY INFORMATION

You are currently in the IPANM Public Newsroom.
  MEMBERS: Please login below to access exclusive MEMBERS ONLY information, including

Regulatory updates
The IPANM Event Calendar
Information and Issues
IPANM Policy Positions
The IPANM Member Directory
Legislative Bill Tracking with BillTrack 50
Access to your IPANM Memberzone information page

IPANM (Sept. 19, 2025) – Today, IPANM filed all of its witness rebuttal testimony to the Oil Conservation Commission regarding Western Environmental Law Center (WELC)’s Rulemaking Petition to raise financial assurance levels on state lands. These IPANM filings represent our strongest pushback against WELC’s Direct Testimony and OCD’s Direct Testimony calling for dramatic increases to financial assurance bonding.

Rebuttal Testimony of Clay Padgett
Rebuttal Testimony of John Nabors
Rebuttal Testimony of Mike Cantrell
Rebuttal Testimony of Mike Hannagan
Rebuttal Testimony of Robert Arscott PhD
Rebuttal Testimony of T. Calder Ezzell
Rebuttal Testimony of Trevor Gilstrap
Rebuttal Testimony of Jim Winchester

All other parties to this rulemaking hearing, including WELC, OCD, NMOGA, and Occidental Petroleum, also filed rebuttal testimony today.

IPANM is treating this rulemaking with the highest priority, and our direct testimony filed August 8th and today’s rebuttal testimony reflects our most vigorous opposition to this proposed rule. The proposed rule is being pushed administratively after the enviros and the OCD failed to get legislation passed in previous sessions.

IPANM’s Legal Team on the WELC Rulemaking has been led by Drew Cloutier and Ann Tripp of Hinkle Shanor LLP in Roswell.

IPANM (Sept. 15, 2025) IPANM and NMOGA have filed a motion to dismiss the entire WELC Rulemaking Hearing regarding new proposed Financial Assurance Bonding levels and new authority to cancel well acquisitions. The Motion to Dismiss  is based on many factors, including the lack of authority of the Oil Conservation Commission (OCC) to arbitrarily set financial assurance bonding rates without statutory authority. Lawyers for industry believe there are legitimate grounds to question whether the OCC is overstepping its authority on setting these new bonding levels and additional rules.  Industry cites precedent, where by in 2018’s Financial Assurance Rulemaking, the Commission had legislative authority to create new bonding levels through the passage of SB189 (2018).

The OCC will need to decide on the motion either before or at the beginning of next month’s October 20th to November 7th rulemaking hearing.

IPANM & NMOGA Motion To Dismiss WELC Rulemaking Hearing

FNREL (Sept. 4, 2025) – The Foundation for Natural Resources and Energy Law has asked IPANM to announce some upcoming education opportunities with significant discounts available to IPANM members.  Please click on link below.

Regulatory Courses Available At Discount to IPANM Members

 

IPANM (August 8, 2025) IPANM filed all of its witness testimony to the Oil Conservation Commission regarding Western Environmental Law Center (WELC)’s Rulemaking Petition to raise financial assurance levels on state lands. These IPANM filings represent a year’s worth of policy discussion, data collection, and witness testimony in opposition of WELC’s overly prescriptive and overly costly rule.

Make no mistake, this rulemaking is being driven by environmental groups that want to end the secondary lifecycles of marginal wells. The New Mexico Oil Conservation Division has done no favors for us either through their near blanket-support of these proposals, as their testimony reflects.

IPANM is treating this rulemaking with the highest priority, and our testimony reflects our most vigorous opposition to this proposed rule.  (For context, the proposed rule is being pushed administratively after the enviros and the OCD failed to get legislation passed in previous sessions.)

All testimony is now public record, and below are links to IPANM’s witness testimony. IPANM would like to thank these members who are standing up to represent the collective interests of independents.

Witness Topic:  Effects on Operators
Testimony of David Mitchell
Testimony of George Sharpe
Testimony of Jerome McHugh, Jr.
Testimony of Vern Andrews
Witness Topic:  Effects on Deals & Acquisitions
Testimony of Jeff Harvard
Testimony of Kyle Armstrong
Witness Topic: Conservation Tax
Testimony of Mark Murphy
Witness Topic: Legalities of Rule
Testimony of T. Calder Ezzell
Witness Topic: Bonding Markets
Testimony of Trevor Gilstrap
Witness Topic: Study Findings
Testimony of Robert Arscott
Witness Topic: Rule Impacts in Colorado
Testimony of Sam Bradley
Witness Topic: General Context/Member Issues
Testimony of Jim Winchester

IPANM’s Legal Team on the WELC Rulemaking has been led by Drew Cloutier and Ann Tripp of Hinkle Shanor LLP in Roswell. On behalf of the membership, I’d like to thank our legal team for months of fulltime work to prepare our filings, Hinkle Shanor LLP.

IPANM’s Complete Financial Assurance Testimony Filed

NMOGA’s Full Filings

NMOCD’s Full Filings

WELC’s Full Filings

Oxy’s Full Filings

State Land Office’s Full Filings

 

 

IPANM (June 25, 2025) – On Tuesday, June 25, 2025, the non-partisan New Mexico Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) released this 47-page report intended to present a non-biased view of the abandoned well program in New Mexico.

In anticipation of the release of the report, IPANM (and a representative from the New Mexico Oil & Gas Association – NMOGA) traveled to Taos to get hands-on the first paper copies of the report, released around Noon Tuesday. Because an LFC presentation of the report was set for hearing immediately upon release of the report, IPANM and NMOGA both requested the opportunity to offer immediate public reaction to the report and presentation.

IPANM’s public comments during the hearing can be found by clicking and scrolling to TIME CODE 4:57:20  of the LFC Committee Hearing Stream – June 24, 2025. NMOGA’s public comments are immediately after in the video stream.

To watch the entirety of the LFC Abandoned Wells Report presentation followed by comments from the New Mexico Oil Conservation Division (OCD), start at TIMECODE 2:40:45. Questions from legislators begin at TIMECODE 3:15:15 immediately following the LFC and OCD presentations.

As noted during public comments, IPANM was not consulted by LFC or any LFC analysts -at any time- during the information gathering phase of this report. Without consideration and analysis of data from small producers, the LFC report is “highly problematic”.

Following Tuesday’s public comments, IPANM Executive Director Jim Winchester issued the following statement:

“While we appreciate the hard work of the Legislative Finance Committee with the goal to present a non-biased analysis, IPANM strongly believes the study has some conclusions and erroneous estimations due to a lack of sufficient data and an underreporting of the detrimental consequences of haphazardly raising financial assurance bonding on small producers. Some of the recommended actions would make the problem worse by leading to an immediate spike in abandoned wells and driving many highly reputable small oil & gas companies out of business.

IPANM members and the industry plugs their own wells after they cease production at a rate of 98%, but that is not good enough. That is why the Reclamation Fund is set up and entirely funded by industry to account for abandoned wells. Sadly, it is the Legislature that has taken 15 out of every 17 dollars of industry’s money in the fund earmarked for clean-up, and unjustifiably allocated those industry dollars elsewhere for the past 15+ years. This problem can be fixed by the Legislature simply reallocating industry’s money back to their intended purpose, as proposed by industry in SB249 in 2024 and HB403 in 2025 during the New Mexico Legislative Sessions. This bill fix must be passed by the very Legislators who continue to annually rob the fund to pay for low-priority pet projects.”

IPANM contends that raising financial assurance will not solve the problem of abandoned wells, as the industry-financed reclamation fund has long been the mechanism to provide insurance to the state to plug abandoned wells. In addition to the Legislature robbing the state of those earmarked clean-up funds, it’s inexcusable that the New Mexico Oil Conservation Division has a balance of tens of millions of dollars of unspent money still sitting in that fund today. The state needs to take be more efficient and held responsible to spend those existing industry funds, which continue to accrue even with the Legislature raiding 15 of every 17 dollars already funded by industry for clean-up.

The LFC report comes at a time when the environmental groups and the the New Mexico Oil Conservation Division are pushing for higher financial assurance levels for operators, rather than fixing the systematic breakdown of spending industry clean-up dollars. IPANM has intervened in the October 20, 2025 rulemaking hearing in front of the Oil Conservation Commission. With IPANM’s efforts to correctly fix the state’s own issues, IPANM holds true to its mission to protect, defend, and promote the work of independent producers and all of industry in New Mexico.

 

By Missi Currier | CEO, New Mexico Oil & Gas Association

When it comes to environmental responsibility, New Mexico’s oil and gas industry is not just stepping up — we’re leading the way.

In recent years, oil and gas operators plugged over 90% of the wells decommissioned in the state. That’s 451 wells plugged by industry, compared to just 49 plugged by the Oil Conservation Division. For every well plugged using public funds, the oil and gas industry independently plugs 10 more — without fanfare, and without burdening New Mexico taxpayers.

Let’s be clear: Only tax dollars paid by the oil and gas industry are used to plug orphaned wells in New Mexico. Not a single cent comes from the pockets of New Mexico families. The millions spent by OCD to plug wells came directly from the Reclamation Fund — funded entirely by industry-paid taxes.

Of the 68,516 active wells in New Mexico, approximately 34,000 are state and fee wells. Among those, just 349 are classified as orphaned — a remarkably low orphan rate of about 1%. This is a testament to the industry’s commitment to responsible operations and long-term stewardship. However, we know that 1% is still too many, and the industry is committed to continuing our work with OCD to ensure the reduction of that number.

Yet, despite this strong track record, we face a critical challenge: ensuring that the funds dedicated to well-plugging are used for that purpose. In 2022, the Reclamation Fund held $21 million. By November 2024, that balance had grown to approximately $66 million, thanks to increased federal support and continued contributions from the Conservation Tax directly from industry.

But these funds are only effective if they’re deployed efficiently. Delays in procurement and administrative bottlenecks risk not only slowing progress but also jeopardizing future funding. New Mexico’s leadership must prioritize using these dollars as intended — on well plugging and site remediation — not diverting them to unrelated initiatives.

The oil and gas industry supports modernizing the Reclamation Fund to ensure it remains a sustainable, efficient tool for environmental protection. That means streamlining procurement, reducing administrative burdens, and preserving the fund’s integrity for its intended purpose. The oil and gas industry is proud to carry the responsibility of plugging and remediating wells. During a well’s lifetime, it provides energy for the world and contributes to our state’s economy. At the end of its cycle, the land is returned to its native state. It’s a responsibility we take seriously — and one we’re already fulfilling. Let’s work together to ensure that the systems in place support this important work, now and for generations to come.

New York Post (June 12, 2025) WASHINGTON — The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing the removal of Biden administration greenhouse gas regulations — which saddled the energy industry with an extra $1.3 billion per year in costs — in order to provide cheaper electricity produced by coal and natural gas, The Post can reveal.

EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin will announce later Wednesday the repeal of two emissions standards that targeted coal and gas power plants generating electricity and had been projected to raise energy costs by nearly $20 billion over the next two decades, officials said.

“The sole purpose of these Biden-Harris administration regulations was to destroy industries that didn’t align with their narrow-minded climate change zealotry,” Zeldin said in a statement Wednesday. “Together, these rules were designed to regulate coal, oil and gas out of existence.”

EPA to save more than $1B per year after scrapping Biden-era gas, coal power plant emissions standards

 

Power The Future (May 30, 2025) Washington, D.C. – American oil production set a new record of 13.488 million barrels per day in March 2025 according to information released today from the Energy Information Administration. This milestone underscores the strength of American energy worker’s commitment to energy dominance.

“This historic achievement is a testament to the unwavering dedication of American energy workers and the decisive leadership of President Trump,” said Daniel Turner, Founder and Executive Director for Power The Future. “This is further proof that when we have common sense prevail in Washington, our energy workers are able to lead the world in critical energy production. The results will be lower prices and a stronger economy which spells victory for American workers and American consumers.”

U.S. Oil Production Sets New Record as American Energy Dominance Begins

 

This content is for members only.

Please login here! If you have any questions about your membership, please email megan@ipanm.org.

Central Texas News (April 22, 2025) –
By The Empowerment Alliance

How far will green energy proponents go to push their agenda? Well, apparently so far they will go against science and hide information from the American people—even information that shows benefits to the very environment they claim to protect.

Last month, it was revealed that former President Biden’s Department of Energy buried a September 2023 study on liquefied natural gas (LNG) that revealed that increased LNG exports had little effect on domestic natural gas prices and would actually lower global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions.

That determination is reinforced by data from the Center for LNG. Switching to natural gas to generate electricity is the top reason the U.S. has been so successful at lowering emissions since 2005. That same principle can be applied abroad. U.S. LNG nearly halves the emissions from the use of coal in Europe and Asia. In a head-to-head comparison, natural gas exported from the U.S. even has significantly lower emissions than natural gas from Russia.

So, why would they hide their own report that had seemingly positive findings? The answer seems to be that it didn’t reinforce their decision to halt (or “pause,” if you want to use the Biden-speak) approvals of U.S. LNG export licenses. Or, more broadly, it contradicted the scorched earth scenario the green-at-any-cost crowd likes to paint of our energy future—where they claim that any use of traditional energy sources like oil and natural gas will doom us forever.

Fast forward to December 2024, as the former administration was practically out the door, and a new DOE report was released under the exact same title. However, a key part of the 2023 report had been erased. An analysis of what’s called “the consideration of market effects.” That analysis determined the U.S. LNG exports would bring down global emissions by displacing more polluting sources of energy used abroad.

When the December 2024 report was release, then-Energy Secretary Jennifer Granholm even said that the reported showed “in every scenario, increases in LNG exports would lead to increases in global net emissions.” Well, every scenario except the one that they cut out.

Thankfully, there’s a new sheriff in town.

Thankfully, the new administration is not making its energy decisions based on a green agenda or any agenda for that matter. Policies are being made based on science and economic principles. As they should be. On his first day back in office, President Trump removed the Biden “pause” on LNG export approvals. And, new energy secretary, Chris Wright, made five LNG-related approvals between taking the job in February and mid-March.

As Secretary Wright put it at CERAWeek 2025: “I’m honored to play a role in reversing what I believe has been very poor direction in energy policy. The previous administration’s policy was focused myopically on climate change with people as simply collateral damage. My predecessor was on this stage one year ago, saying that LNG exports would soon be in the rearview mirror. Think about that for a moment. Natural gas today supplies 25% of global primary energy and has been the fastest growing source of energy over the last 15 years.”

Those are the facts. Natural gas is the most affordable, reliable and clean energy source in our energy mix. Its advantages are countless and the energy it contributes globally can hardly be replaced—or erased no matter how many DOE studies they fudge. And, that is all a very good thing. An abundant energy sources with all those advantages makes the world a better place. The U.S. is a “natural gas superpower.”

And, when America is the key producer of that energy source for our own needs and globally, that makes us and the world safer and cleaner. Former Energy Secretary Granholm couldn’t have got it more wrong. U.S. LNG is the literal light on the world’s horizon—not in its rearview mirror. Our ability to supply the world with natural gas is only growing.

According to the U.S. Energy Information Administration, U.S. LNG export capacity will likely increase from 11.5 billion cubic feet per day in 2023 to 24.4. in 2028—more than doubling in the next five years. As energy author Robert Bryce puts it: “If that happens, US LNG export capacity will equal or exceed, the gas production of both Iran and China. (In 2023, Iran produced 24.3 Bcf/d, and China produced 22.7 Bcf/d). That, ladies and gentlemen, is evidence that the US is a natural gas superpower.”

Our ability to supply the world with natural gas has become possible because the U.S. leads the world in natural gas production. U.S. natural gas production plateaued sometime in the 1970s. But, in 2005, it started to grow again significantly. That achievement was been driven by groundbreaking technological advances like hydraulic fracturing that have allowed us to tap America’s extensive natural resources. Since then, U.S. natural gas production has more than doubled. According to Bryce’s analysis of data, the U.S. is now producing more natural gas than Canada, China, Iran, Norway, and Qatar combined.

But that achievement was also possible because of leaders making policies that nurtured growth, technology, and economic investment. We welcome a return to that kind of leadership, which we are now seeing from President Trump and his Energy Dream Team appointees. But we must be vigilant. If we allow ourselves to be dragged backward by short-sighted leaders with a politicized green agenda, we will sacrifice our standing as a world energy superpower to the countries that follow on that list, like Russia, Iran, and China. That isn’t good for the world, and it certainly isn’t good for America.

The Empowerment Alliance (TEA) is a 501(c)(4) organization founded in 2019 that advocates for U.S. energy independence, according to EmpoweringAmerica.org. TEA supports using American innovation and free-market principles to ensure affordable, reliable, and clean energy.

Biden Hid Facts To Force Unnecessary LNG Export Pause