A New Day at IPANM

 

 

Newsroom

IPANM (Nov. 27, 2024) - On Wednesday, the New Mexico Court of Appeals issued a ruling in IPANM's legal challenge
Power The Future (Nov. 21, 2024) - In a last-ditch effort to cement their radical climate agenda, the Biden-Harris administration’s Environmental
Santa Fe New Mexican (Nov. 17, 2024) - DEMOCRATS (MAJORITY) – New Legislative Leaders HOUSE: State House Democrats elevated Santa Fe
ABQ Journal (Nov. 15, 2024) —With the large number of state representatives and senators who decided to retire from the
E&E News via Politico/Greenwire (April 24, 2024, Posted to IPANM Website on November 14, 2024) - A Trump administration Interior
E&E News via Politico (February 5, 2024, Posted to IPANM Website November 13, 2024) - A former Trump Interior Department
Roswell Daily Record (Nov. 9, 2024) - New Mexico Senate Republicans have elevated a longtime lawmaker from northwestern New Mexico
By Missi Currier, Jim Winchester, and Ben Shepperd | Nov 9, 2024 Published In Several State Newspapers (Nov. 9, 2024)
Washington Post via City Desk ABQ (Nov. 6, 2024) - President-elect Donald Trump’s return to the White House could reverse
CTEH Report (Nov. 1, 2024) - CTEH has releases a report summarizing their findings of existing data and studies on

MEMBERS ONLY INFORMATION

You are currently in the IPANM Public Newsroom.
  MEMBERS: Please login below to access exclusive MEMBERS ONLY information, including

Regulatory updates
The IPANM Event Calendar
Information and Issues
IPANM Policy Positions
The IPANM Member Directory
Legislative Bill Tracking with BillTrack 50
Access to your IPANM Memberzone information page

IPANM (Nov. 27, 2024) – On Wednesday, the New Mexico Court of Appeals issued a ruling in IPANM’s legal challenge to the New Mexico Ozone Precursor (Methane) Rule.  The full ruling can be found here.

In response to the ruling, IPANM has released the following statement:

We respectfully disagree with the New Mexico Court of Appeals ruling on IPANM’s legal challenge to the Ozone Precursor (Methane) Rule. As our arguments indicate, we support the goal of the rule to reduce emissions, but not with current provisions in the rule that overreach by wiping out a secondary market for marginal wells that may otherwise continue to safely produce oil & gas to the benefit of all New Mexicans. While we are disappointed, we are reviewing our options moving forward in this case.

Unfortunately, this rule and many other overzealous regulations being pushed out by New Mexico state regulators continue to disproportionately hurt independent operators. The current state administration needs to stop it’s “death by a thousand cuts” hostility to the smaller, family-owned, New Mexico-based operators.

–Jim Winchester
IPANM Executive Director

Power The Future (Nov. 21, 2024) – In a last-ditch effort to cement their radical climate agenda, the Biden-Harris administration’s Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) finalized a new rule imposing a hefty methane fee on oil and gas companies. Just as the administration, which voters rejected at the ballot box, is on its way out, the EPA is scrambling to push through as many action as possible before former New York Congressman Lee Zeldin takes over.

According to an EPA press release, “$900 per metric ton of wasteful emissions in CY 2024, increasing to $1,200 for CY 2025, and $1,500 for CY 2026 and beyond.”

This methane fee is yet another example of the Biden-Harris administration’s heavy-handed approach to environmental policy. By imposing such a steep fee, the EPA is essentially penalizing American energy producers and driving up costs for consumers. This rule is not about protecting the environment; it’s about pushing a radical agenda that benefits special interests and hurts American workers and families.

Fortunately, there is hope on the horizon. Lee Zeldin is expected to be appointed EPA administrator and has made it clear that he will seek to undo much of the Biden-Harris administration’s overreach. Zeldin understands that a strong energy sector is essential to America’s economic prosperity and national security. He will work to reverse misguided policies like the EPA’s methane fee and restore common sense to environmental regulation. According to PTF Executive Director Daniel Turner:

As a conservative fighter from deep blue New York, Lee Zeldin knows how to win in the toughest political terrain. There is no greater priority for the incoming administration than rolling back the maze of regulations and red tape imposed by the Biden Administration on America’s energy producers. The EPA has been a chief culprit in this misguided endeavor, and we look forward to Administrator Zeldin restoring common sense, starting by rescinding their reckless mandates on methane and electric vehicles.”

The EPA’s last-minute methane fee is a desperate attempt to entrench the Biden-Harris administration’s failed policies before they leave office. This rule will only serve to burden American energy producers and drive-up costs for consumers. Fortunately, Administrator Zeldin will be committed to undoing this and other misguided policies. It’s time to restore common sense to environmental regulation and prioritize the economic well-being of American families. The EPA’s last-minute scramble is a clear sign that their days of overreach are numbered. With Zeldin at the helm, we can look forward to a more balanced and sensible approach to energy policy.

EPA’s Last-Minute Methane Fee: A Desperate Attempt to Entrench Biden-Harris Policies Before Zeldin Takes Over

Santa Fe New Mexican (Nov. 17, 2024) –

DEMOCRATS (MAJORITY) – New Legislative Leaders
HOUSE: State House Democrats elevated Santa Fe Rep. Reena Szczepanski to majority floor leader Saturday morning as both parties filled leadership positions for the upcoming legislative session.
SENATE: In the Senate, Mimi Stewart, D-Albuquerque, was reelected as Senate president pro tempore, and Sen. Peter Wirth, D-Santa Fe, returns as majority leader. He has served in that role since 2017.

REPUBLICANS – New Legislative Leaders
HOUSE: House Republicans made history by naming Rep. Gail Armstrong, R-Magdalena, as minority leader. She will be the first woman to head the House Republican caucus.
SENATE: Senate Republicans made their leadership choices last week, unanimously elevating Farmington Sen. Bill Sharer to minority leader. He replaces Sen. Greg Baca, R-Belen, who did not run for reelection this year.

More detailed information: SF New Mexican Full Story – New Legislative Leaders Selected After Caucus Meetings

ABQ Journal (Nov. 15, 2024) —With the large number of state representatives and senators who decided to retire from the Legislature this year, New Mexico has known for quite some time 2025 would bring a lot of new faces in the Roundhouse.

Now that the 2024 election cycle has wrapped up and unofficial results are in, the state has concrete numbers: There will be 28 new representatives and senators serving New Mexico come 2025.

The 42-member Senate is getting 15 new legislators, nine Republicans and six Democrats. That includes four policymakers who formerly served in the House.

The 70-member House is getting 13 new legislators, seven Republicans and six Democrats.

Three of the 28 policymakers are also ex-legislators who served in past years returning to the Roundhouse: Republican Gabriel Ramos and Democrat Linda Trujillo in the Senate, and Republican Rebecca Dow in the House.

Republicans picked up a few seats in the election, shifting the Democratic majority to a margin of 26-16 in the Senate and 44-26 in the House.

The new senators:

District 2: Steve Lanier, R-Aztec
District 9: Cindy Nava, D-Bernalillo
District 12: Jay Block, R-Rio Rancho
District 13: Debbie O’Malley, D-Albuquerque
District 15: Heather Berghmans, D-Albuquerque
District 18: Natalie Figueroa, D-Albuquerque
District 19: Ant Thornton, R-Sandia Park
District 21: Nicole Tobiassen, R-Albuquerque
District 24: Linda Trujillo, D-Santa Fe
District 27: Patrick Henry Boone IV, R-Elida
District 28: Gabriel Ramos, R-Silver City
District 30: Angel Charley, D-Acoma
District 32: Candy Spence Ezzell, R-Roswell
District 33: Nicholas Paul R-Alamogordo
District 34: James Townsend, R-Artesia
District 42: Larry Scott, R-Hobbs

The new representatives:

District 3: William Hall, R-Aztec
District 4: Joseph Hernandez, D-Shiprock
District 18: Marianna Anaya, D-Albuquerque
District 30: Elizabeth Diane Torres-Velasquez, D-Albuquerque
District 31: Nicole Chavez, R-Albuquerque
District 38: Rebecca Dow, R-Truth or Consequences
District 53: Sarah Silva, D-Las Cruces
District 54: Jonathan Allen Henry, R-Artesia
District 57: Catherine Cullen, R-Rio Rancho (potential vote recount)
District 58: Angelita Mejia, R-Dexter
District 62: Elaine Sena Cortez, R-Hobbs
District 69: Michelle Abeyta, D-Tohajiilee
District 70: Anita Amalia Gonzales, D-Las Vegas

E&E News via Politico/Greenwire (April 24, 2024, Posted to IPANM Website on November 14, 2024) – A Trump administration Interior Department 2.0 — if it happens — could well turn out to be a reboot of the original.

Particularly at the department’s upper levels, Interior veterans of the first Trump administration are being cited by their former colleagues and others with skin in the game as strong potential candidates to serve again, if former President Donald Trump wins against President Joe Biden in November.

“I think there are going to be a lot of familiar faces that will want to go back,” said Cole Rojewski, Interior’s congressional liaison between 2019 and 2021. “I think a lot of people enjoyed their experience in the Trump administration.”

Many remain hesitant to publicly ‘fess up to specific Interior ambitions right now. But in interviews with former Trump administration officials, Capitol Hill veterans, GOP-connected lobbyists and others, a number of names keep popping up.

Those among the frequently mentioned range from former Interior Secretary David Bernhardt down to other political appointees now leading agencies in Republican-led states.

“I think there are some great people,” Rep. Ryan Zinke (R-Mont.), Trump’s first Interior secretary, told E&E News, adding that “there are a lot of areas where the president is going to need some help [and] there are some folks that served before and understand the issues.”

Zinke stepped down after two years in the top job in the face of ethics inquiries that he called partisan and unfounded. He was subsequently elected to a House seat that he had held previously. Zinke said both that he has “not been asked” about a possible second appointment and that a “president is hard to say no to.”

The former Navy SEAL officer further stressed that “there are a lot of variables” affecting the decisionmaking both of an incoming president and a potential appointee. Down-ballot election results, partisan balances in the House and Senate and the idiosyncrasies of Trump’s approach to team-building all play a role.

“There are a lot of people who [were] involved in his first term and played a significant role and made a great contribution. I’m sure they’d be keen on going back and completing the work that we began,” said former Trump-era Bureau of Land Management official William Perry Pendley.

For Full Article: Interior Alumni Eye Return For A Second Trump Term

E&E News via Politico (February 5, 2024, Posted to IPANM Website November 13, 2024) – A former Trump Interior Department official has one overarching recommendation for his old boss, should former President Donald Trump win a second bid at the White House: undo what President Joe Biden did.

That directive from William Perry Pendley — who served as the de facto head of Trump’s Bureau of Land Management from 2019 to 2021 — is part of a policy road map advanced by the Heritage Foundation along with dozens of conservative groups, called Project 2025, that would help Trump swiftly reestablish his policy prerogatives should he prevail in the November election.

The road map’s Interior section, written by Pendley, would reinstate some of the department orders from Trump’s first stint in the Oval Office that Biden reversed. Pendley’s plans include reopening most of the National Petroleum Reserve-Alaska to oil and gas developers, cutting new protections for migratory birds, and relocating the BLM national headquarters back to

Pendley called for a reinstatement of Trump-era secretarial orders, revoked by Interior Secretary Deb Haaland for being “inconsistent with protecting public health and the environment,” to limit National Environmental Policy Act reviews and expedite permitting for oil and gas developers.

For full story:  Trump Blueprint Would Revive Interior ‘Energy Dominance’ Push

Roswell Daily Record (Nov. 9, 2024) – New Mexico Senate Republicans have elevated a longtime lawmaker from northwestern New Mexico to lead their ranks.

Senate Republicans elevated longtime Sen. William Sharer (R-Farmington) to the position of Senate Minority Leader, Sen. Pat Woods (R-Broadview) the Senate Minority Leader and Sen. David Gallegos (R-Eunice) Senate Republican Caucus Chair, according to a press release.

Sen-Elect Jim Townsend (R-Artesia), a house member who was elected Tuesday in Senate District 34, which includes Otero and Eddy counties, said the vote was taken during a call of Republican senators, where Sharer, Woods and Gallegos were each nominated and elected by acclamation to those leadership positions.

“There was a lot of unity within the caucus,” Townsend said.

Sharer replaces Sen. Greg Baca (R-Belen) who held the top post since 2021 but decided not to seek reelection in Senate District 29.

Following the leadership election, Sharer said that he was honored to be selected to lead the Senate Republican caucus.

“I intend to usher in an era of unity and conservative principles to the Senate Republican Caucus. The overtaxed and hardworking men and women will have a voice in this caucus,” Sharer said.

In the press release, Sharer also railed against “progressives” who he accused of creating a hostile business climate and that the education system in New Mexico must be “entirely reformed so that businesses will have skilled employees to hire.”

“We will act to bring New Mexico back from the brink with conservative solutions and leadership,” he said.

According to his campaign website, Sharer was born in Albuquerque and spent much of his life in Farmington, having graduated from Farmington High School. He is an alumnus of the New Mexico Military Institute in Roswell and New Mexico State University.

Sharer is a former U.S. Army officer who served as an infantry soldier and graduated from the Airborne Ranger and Special Forces School. He now operates a business in Farmington.

In 2000, Sharer was elected to the first of six terms in the Senate. Sharer represents Senate District 1, which encompasses San Juan County. He is currently the top-ranking member of the Senate Finance Committee, as well as the Legislative Finance Committee and the Interim Legislative Ethics Committee.

During the 30-day legislative session earlier this year, Sharer spearheaded opposition on the Senate floor to a proposal to make paid family and medical leave available to New Mexicans. Sharer and other opponents argued that the requirements would burden businesses. The measure did pass the Senate but was defeated in the House.

Republican senators also made Woods the number two Republican in the Senate, a position known as the minority whip. Woods has represented Senate District 7 since 2013. The district includes parts of Curry, Quay and Union counties.

Like Sharer, Woods is a member of the Senate Finance Committee and Legislative Finance Committee. He also sits on the Senate Legislative Council, the Transportation and Infrastructure Revenue Subcommittee and the Water and Natural Resources Committee.

In the press release announcing the results of the leadership election, Woods claimed that the rights of all New Mexicans have been under attack and that he and his colleagues must champion lower taxes, safeguarding what he calls “parental rights” and rights under the Second Amendment, and hold criminals accountable.

Republicans tapped Gallegos for the position of Republican Caucus chair. Gallegos was elected to the New Mexico House in 2013 and then the New Mexico Senate in 2020 in Senate District 41, which consists of Eddy and Lea Counties. He is the lead Republican on the Senate Conservation Committee and a member of the Senate Education Committee.

Additionally, Gallegos is a member of three interim committees: the Legislative Finance Committee, the Legislative Health and Human Services Committee and Radioactive and Hazardous Materials Committee.

Gallegos has been an ardent defender of the oil and gas industry and an opponent of abortion rights. In the press release, Gallegos said that Hispanics are conservative on political issues and need to be brought into the Republican camp.

“We wish to govern in a way that welcomes these voters,” he said. Gallegos also said the state needs to take action to secure the 184 miles of border that New Mexico shares with Mexico, which he calls “the number one issue right now for all New Mexicans.”

Currently, Democrats hold a 27 to 15 majority in the Senate, a margin that slightly shifted when Republicans had a net gain of one seat after voters went to the polls on Tuesday.

Unofficial returns show that Jay Block (R-Rio Rancho) won the Senate District 12 seat currently held by retiring veteran Sen. Gerald Ortiz y Pino (D-Albuquerque). The party also won a seat in Senate District 28, where Republican Gabriel Ramos will replace outgoing Sen. Siah Correa Hemphill (D-Silver City).

Democrats partially offset those gains by picking up Senate District 30, where Democrat Angel Charley was running unopposed for the seat now held by Sen. Joshua Hernandez (R-Bosque), who instead ran and won this year in Senate District 29.

The Senate will convene on Jan. 21 for its regular 60-day session.

By Missi Currier, Jim Winchester, and Ben Shepperd | Nov 9, 2024

Published In Several State Newspapers (Nov. 9, 2024) – The Oil Conservation Commission will consider changes to PFAS rules in New Mexico related to oil and gas use. This rulemaking request was made by WildEarth Guardians and New Energy Economy.

The New Mexico oil and gas trade associations and these environmental nonprofits (eNGOs) agree — PFAS should not be utilized in oil and gas production. However, we differ on what we see as fearmongering tactics that utilize half-truths and purposely ignore the best available science and PFAS facts. A common tactic used by eNGOs is playing on people’s fears in the pursuit of a much more sinister agenda — to shut down one of the most valuable industries in our beloved state.

PFAS are everywhere and are safely used in your everyday life. PFAS are a diverse class of thousands of fluorinated substances that have been used extensively in industrial, commercial and consumer applications, including electronics, gaskets and seals, friction reducers, outdoor gear and clothing, and nonstick coatings for household products.

PFAS are not intentionally used in fracking in New Mexico. Some PFAS are ubiquitous in the environment and come from sources such as municipal water, surface water and private well water. So, while your municipal water may have PFAS, so might the water used in fracking — and because of that, opponents of oil and natural gas claim fracking uses PFAS. This is a half-truth that conveniently leaves out the scientific research on PFAS in water sources.

Opponents of the industry are implementing additional scare tactics. For example, they are claiming oil and gas operators are not required to disclose their proprietary chemicals and they are actually trying to hide PFAS in their operations. These are false claims.

The New Mexico Hydraulic Fracturing Disclosure mandates all oil and gas operators report the composition of the hydraulic fracturing fluid used during hydraulic fracturing operations. FracFocus records everything from the trade name to the supplier to the purpose of the ingredient and maximum concentration. Proprietary ingredients are recorded in the national database in a way that does not waive recognized trade secret protections. Translation: The industry is already required by law to report their chemical usage and ensure that PFAS are not intentionally utilized while protecting proprietary information and trade secrets that keep American companies competitive.

Industry opponents continue to use fearmongering and your tax dollars to engage in an unnecessary and costly state rulemaking process to address an issue that is simply not an issue.

As leaders in the energy sector, we are committed to ensuring New Mexico remains a safe and healthy place for all residents. We will continue working with regulators and researchers to ensure the safest and cleanest operations based on the full, factual picture from the best available science. Most important, we are committed to working with facts, not fear.

Missi Currier is the president and CEO of the New Mexico Oil and Gas Association; Jim Winchester is the executive director of the Independent Petroleum Association of New Mexico; Ben Shepperd is the president of the Permian Basin Petroleum Association.

 

Washington Post via City Desk ABQ (Nov. 6, 2024) – President-elect Donald Trump’s return to the White House could reverse the gains the United States has made in fighting global warming, experts said, by cementing his plans to unleash domestic fossil fuel production, dismantle key environmental rules and scale back federal support for renewable energy and electric vehicles.

It has also raised fears amongU.S. allies and even some major energy executives who warn a U.S. exit from global climate efforts will hurt American industry as the rest of the world shiftsaway from fossil fuels.

Trump’s election creates “a very long pathway for fossil fuels,” Ben Cahill, an energy scholar at the University of Texas at Austin, said in a phone interview Wednesday. “Investors will feel the outlook is brighter. The industry will be under less pressure.”

While energy was not a focal point of a presidential campaign consumed by immigration, abortion and the future of democracy, it is a policy area where presidents have the authority to make sweeping changes.

Trump – who has dismissed climate change as a “hoax” and courted oil company executives throughout the campaign – has outlined plans that have the potential to boost oil and gas profits as well as greenhouse gas emissions that threaten the world’s climate goals.

Trump is expected to immediately take aim at the Paris climate accord. His plan to withdraw the United States from the pact – as he did during his first term – comes at a critical moment for the compact aimed at limiting warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius (2.7 degrees Fahrenheit)above preindustrial levels. Climate scientists are already warning the planet is on track to blow pastthat target: on Wednesday the European climate agency Copernicus announced that 2024 is assured to be the first calendar year where the global temperature rise has averaged 1.5 degrees Celsius.

Trump has planned a flurry of other actions to bolster U.S. oil and gas companies. He is expected to ease a suite of restrictions on the oil industry’s emissions of methane, a potent greenhouse gas. And he will probably cancel the Biden administration’s pause on permits for new liquefied natural gas export projects, clearing the way for the industry to build billions of dollars worth of infrastructure that could increase U.S. emissions and keep gas flowing to other nations for decades to come.

Oil companies welcome the radical policy shift. “Energy was on the ballot, and voters sent a clear signal that they want choices, not mandates, and an all-of-the-above approach that harnesses our nation’s resources and builds on the successes of his first term,” Mike Sommers, president of the American Petroleum Institute,said in a statement.

What Trump’s victory could mean for oil companies and climate change policy

CTEH Report (Nov. 1, 2024) – CTEH has releases a report summarizing their findings of existing data and studies on the health impacts of well production and whether setbacks are necessary or provide any measurable benefits.  Here are some key conclusions:

Leveraging Best Available Science for New Mexico

  • Health outcome studies of assumed exposures are largely inconsistent, lack cohesiveness of
    findings, and cannot be reliably used to show causal evidence that O&G emissions cause specific
    adverse health outcomes.
  • Measured exposure data collected in communities near oil and gas development in NM and other
    states, along with formal risk assessments, have shown chemicals NOT to been at levels of concern
    for adverse health risks.
  • Performance of additional environmental measurement and risk assessment analysis in NM would
    reduce scientific uncertainty and public concern for public health impacts.
  • A policy mandating a prescriptive, “one-size-fits-all” setback is NOT a public health policy based on
    best available science.
  • A process using established frameworks would allow best available science to inform policy to
    protect New Mexico citizens.

Setbacks: Decision Making Using Best Available Science (CTEH Report)

Water & Natural Resources Committee Handouts