A New Day at IPANM

 

 

information & issues

Welcome to IPANM’s Information & Issues webpage!

IPANM is not afraid to take strong stances on many current issues threatening our industry. We have to! Seemingly minor changes to regulations or rules can have a major impact on the financial solvency of our small oil & gas producers. While we will never compromise on our duties to protect human health, fresh water and the environment in our daily activities, we will fight unnecessary government overreach when new regulatory proposals are not based on sound science and do little to protect the environment.

Below, we’ve identified serious issues facing our producers. Please click on the corresponding button to learn more about each issue and IPANM’s stance on the issue. (Note: Some of this content may be restricted for members only. To access this exclusive content, please join our association!)

RECENT NEWS: All Issues

Last week Commissioner Dunn at the New Mexico State Land Office held a very productive meeting with industry regarding having
If your company pays into the BLM Permian Basin Programmatic Agreement, there is a meeting scheduled for Thursday, March 3rd,
During the course of the Legislative session, we have had several conversations with Secretary Martin, his staff and Aubrey Dunn
Last week I sent out an email invitation to our membership regarding a meeting to be held TOMORROW at 10am
As we roll into the last week of the New Mexico Legislative Session, the biggest concern is the budget. There
On December 4, 2015, the President signed H.R. 22, the "Fixing America’s Surface Transportation Act" into law (P.L. 114-94). P.L.
The BLM has announced four public meetings on their proposed rule to reduce waste from venting, flaring and leaks, and
IPANM 2016 Legislative Bills
If you currently have Rights of Way (ROW) on Federal Lands, the Federal Government has updated the fees associated with
As you are aware from the many emails IPANM has sent over the years, our membership is very concerned about

Last week Commissioner Dunn at the New Mexico State Land Office held a very productive meeting with industry regarding having an open discussion about the economic pressures operators are facing in this low commodity environment.

PLEASE SEND YOUR COMMENTS TO PATRICK PADILLA AT THE STATE LAND OFFICE at PPadilla@slo.state.nm.us Please submit by Friday March 11th at COB.

First, the Commissioner needs to hear from industry whether we would ask for the option to shut in oil wells. The NMSLO is proposing a separate policy from TA well status that would allow operators to leave production equipment in the wellbore and not be subject to MIT tests, but rather perform an annual bradenhead test to demonstrate wellbore integrity. In order to allow industry to have this option, the Commissioner would need to go through a public hearing process to invoke the provisions in statute. This would open the agency up to vigorous debate from those opposed to industry obtaining any relief (the “Leave it in the ground” folks). While the Commissioner has made it clear that he is willing to go the route of allowing for the shut in for oil wells, he needs to hear from industry directly to make sure that this is an effort worth making on their behalf and would be actually used – unlike the current stripper well program.

Second, industry needs to understand that the costs associated with this relief are set by statute and limited only to OIL wells. Because these provisions are in statute, the State Land Office would not be able to amend them (only the Legislature can amend statutes). In simple terms, an oil well would be allowed to be shut in for economic considerations for up to two years with an annual per well payment equal to either $320 or twice the annual rental for the lease on which it is located, with the greater of the two of those amounts being the rate called for by statute. if there is concern with this provision, please let Mr. Padilla know.

Lastly, while OCD is working with industry and the NMSLO on this, at this time, if operators need assistance with the TA policy, they must speak to Daniel Sanchez at the NMOCD at Daniel.sanchez@state.nm.us

Please make sure that someone from your office responds to Mr. Padilla concerning this issue by Friday this week. It is important that the Commissioner know that industry would be interested in obtaining relief as soon as possible. I would also ask that you cc me in any comments you send, so I can continue to keep this issue at the forefront.

If your company pays into the BLM Permian Basin Programmatic Agreement, there is a meeting scheduled for Thursday, March 3rd, in Santa Fe from 12:30 to 3:30. The BLM intends to extend the PA for another 10 years with the following proposed amendments.

1. To expand the Agreement area by adding all or a portion of 11USGS 7.5 Minute Quadrangle Maps to the 28 quadrangle maps that comprise the existing programmatic Agreement area (PA area). The BLM wishes to expand the area to encompass the increased drilling that is taking place beyond the current boundaries. The additional maps were chosen based on a NM Tech study called, “Reasonable Foreseeable Development” and tracked actual drilling locations for the last three years. Although the PA process cannot be used on State Trust Lands, the distribution of these lands along with private lands was also taken into consideration for the expansion. Please note that although the BLM will tell you differently, if your company intends to have a location on State Trust Lands it is recommended you do an ARMS survey, but no full archeological survey is required. The BLM also states that there are no known Traditional Cultural Properties related to any tribes or pueblos with ancestral ties to the expanded region. Many of the proposed areas have greater than 20% of the area previously surveyed.

The expanded area includes Maps of the following areas:

Angel Draw Quadrangle
Bell Lake Quadrangle
Bell Lake Quadrangle II
Bond Draw
Bond Draw II
Carlsbad East Quadrangle Proposed Area
Cottonwood Hills Quadrangle
Illinois Camp SE Quadrangle
Indian Flats Quadrangle
Malaga Quadrangle
Malaga Quadrangle II
Red Bluff Quadrangle
Red Bluff Quadrangle II
Red Lake Quadrangle
Red Lake Quadrangle II
Spring Lake Quadrangle

2. In addition, the BLM proposes to increase fees every January 1 based upon the rate of inflation determined by the Bureau of Labor – this is instead of the 3% increase on your anniversary date. The allocation of PA project funds will also change from a formula of 75% devoted to excavations and 25% to the preparation of historic contexts, additional surveys, training and data management – to a yearly allocation based on the balance of the funds in the PA, the Workgroups priority determinations, progress on mitigation priorities, and the funding requirements of the Assistance Agreement between the BLM and the NM Department of Cultural Affairs.

Karin Foster, our Executive Director, will be at the March 3rd meeting. HOWEVER, if you have concerns about either of these amendments, please send Martin Stein, Permian Basin PA Coordinator an email AND copy Karin. Mr. Stein’s email is stein@blm.gov and Karin’s email is karin@ipanm.org.

During the course of the Legislative session, we have had several conversations with Secretary Martin, his staff and Aubrey Dunn and his staff regarding finding creative ways to provide some relief to New Mexico’s oil and gas producers. All IPANM members and others in industry are invited to a meeting in Santa Fe on February 26th at 10am. Right now, the meeting is scheduled to be held at Morgan Hall at the State Land Office (the last meeting there before the demolition of that auditorium). However, there is no conference call in capability at Morgan. I am working on obtaining conference call in number and will let you know when one is set up.

Last week I sent out an email invitation to our membership regarding a meeting to be held TOMORROW at 10am at the New Mexico State Land Office. This meeting will be an opportunity for industry to tell our regulators where we need some relief due to low commodity pricing.

In addition, we will have the opportunity to discuss the current stripper well program 19-10-5.1 NMSA (attached) which is already available to producers but is not widely used. This program allows oil well stripper producers to ask for a royalty rate reduction from 12.5% to 5% for a period of three years upon a showing that the operator has taken reasonable steps to minimize his costs of operating the oil well; the oil well will likely be plugged and abandoned in the near future, with a resulting loss of reserves, if operating costs are not reduced further; the oil well will produce for a longer period, and the amount of oil produced will ultimately be larger, if the royalty rate is lowered; and a lower royalty rate will actually maximize revenue to the trust beneficiaries.

If it is important for you or your company to 1. understand the current regulations on the books regarding royalty rate reductions or, 2. to understand the current regulations for temporary shut-in status, or, 3. to ask our regulators for some relief in another area. Please attend this meeting!

If you can not attend, PLEASE SEND ME YOUR COMMENTS so we have the opportunity to present our concerns! Due to technical limitations we will not have conference call ability.

As we roll into the last week of the New Mexico Legislative Session, the biggest concern is the budget. There are many closed door discussions occurring, but the talk is that the State will be over $300 million short in meeting its obligations for FY 16 which ends June 30th. The shortfall for next fiscal year FY 17 is expected to be close to $1B, which means that funds need to come from somewhere. There is talk of a $0.10 gas tax which could come up with $500 million and a full sweep of all Board/Commission reserves for an additional $180 million. While there may be talk about raiding the Permanent Fund which as to today is valued at over 16 billion, the Enabling Act of 1912 prohibits the use of these funds for anything other than education, and any increased distribution would require a change to the NM Constitution. Further, an Act of Congress may be necessary to expend any funds other than those already designated to the original 22 beneficiaries.

I have worked closely with NMOGA and Secretary Martin on SB 8, HB 112, Carlsbad Brine Well Remediation, to establish a five person committee that will be responsible for overseeing the remediation of that problem – including finding funding. IPANM had suggested several amendments, all of which were adopted, to clarify that the Committee only has authority to work on this problem for a ten year period and that NMOCD will remain the main regulatory and enforcing authority over this project.

On Wednesday morning, I testified as the expert witness on HM 81 which asks the Congressional delegation to get more involved and informed about the impacts of the ONRR unbundling issues. The bill passed committee and will be heard on the House Floor this weekend. HM 82, asking for Congressional support addressing concerns over Onshore Orders #3, #4 and #5 also came up in committee and were held due to a lack of votes. I expect it will sail out of committee tomorrow and will be heard either Saturday or Sunday on the House Floor.

In terms of tax breaks for industry, Representative Strickler’s HB 107 to amend the severance tax rate for gas from stripper wells and for oil stripper wells, has been held in House Ways and Means Committee – if any money is found. I have spoken to the sponsor, Chairman Jason Harper and members Townsend, Scott, Gallegos and Montoya who are all very supportive of this issue but there just isn’t any money. Thank you to IPANM members Mullins and McMinn for their excellent testimony on the bill. In terms of helping industry, we still have friends here in Santa Fe. I will be sending another email shortly regarding an upcoming industry meeting.

Thank you.
Karin

On December 4, 2015, the President signed H.R. 22, the “Fixing America’s Surface Transportation Act” into law (P.L. 114-94). P.L. 114-94 includes Section 32301–Interest On Overpayment, which amends the Federal Oil and Gas Royalty Management Act of 1982 to eliminate interest on company overpayments.
What this means is that ONRR will no longer pay interest on your overpayments. We will send additional information in the near future and keep you informed as this legal provision is implemented.

If you have questions, please contact Mr. Hans Meingast at (303) 231-3382 or me at (303) 231-3289.

Barbara J. Lambert
Program Manager, Financial Management
Financial & Production Management (FPM)
DOI, Office of the Secretary, ONRR

Email: Barbara.Lambert@onrr.gov
Office: (303) 231-3289
Work Cell: (303) 330-5334
Fax: (303) 445-8762

The BLM has announced four public meetings on their proposed rule to reduce waste from venting, flaring and leaks, and to clarify when produced gas lost through venting, flaring or leaks is subject to royalties. The first of the four meetings will be held February 16 in Farmington at the San Juan College Room 7103 at 1:00 p.m.

Please see the linked notice for RSVP information and additional dates and locations. A call-in number is also provided for those who cannot attend. The proposed rule can be found at . The attached also provides contact information if you have further questions.

If you currently have Rights of Way (ROW) on Federal Lands, the Federal Government has updated the fees associated with ROW annual payments beginning for years 2016 to 2025.

Please see the attached letter which was sent to current ROW holders in December 2015.

Updated information on Federal ROW rental fee schedules (cost recovery) can be found at this website.

If you have questions, please contact Stephen Fusilier, BLM Rights-of-Way Branch Chief, at (202.912.7148) or sfusilie@blm.gov

As you are aware from the many emails IPANM has sent over the years, our membership is very concerned about both the Sand Dune Lizard and the Lesser Prairie Chicken potential listing decisions. In 2008, IPANM was at the forefront of the litigation on the chicken, our former IPANM President Greg Nibert was instrumental in the 2012 litigation with the Counties against the USFWS. Likewise, on the Sand Dune Lizard, IPANM has worked with Congressman Pearce’s office to speak at rallies, issue comments and support litigants. Industry has won a reprieve on the Lizard with a ‘no-listing’ decision and an injunction in West Texas Federal District Court on the Chicken. In both instances, Industry has contested the science behind the USFWS actions.

Therefore, it is disappointing when, in October 2015, our very own New Mexico Department of Game and Fish released a State Wildlife Action Plan (SWAP) which lists both the Sand Dune Lizard and the Lesser Prairie Chicken as ‘Tier 1 species of greatest concern’. IPANM looked behind the agency’s science on both species and discovered that not only did the reporters rely on data 1991 and 2005 respectively, but they relied on sources from subscription only environmental websites! The purpose of the report was to inflate the number of species of ‘concern’ in New Mexico in order to receive more USFWS funding through a grant. But it also made some very conclusory and poor assumptions such as; the cause of climate change in New Mexico is a direct result of the Oil and Gas Industry and the Agricultural industry; That there are 1200 species who are in peril in New Mexico without additional regulations to manage human impacts on habitats; that there is no industry funding to study the Lizard and inaccessible funding to study the Chicken. The tone of the report was anti-business in general and made conclusions clearly based on the reporter’s biases. Given that the Martinez Administration has positioned itself as ‘pro-business’ this report was disappointing at best.

On November 19th, IPANM sent lengthy comments to each New Mexico Game and Fish Commissioner regarding the faulty assumptions made in the SWAP. At the Commission meeting held in Roswell, it was obvious that the members had read our comments. They also listened to the many commenters, including IPANM, Representative Candy Ezzell and the New Mexico Cattle Growers and made excellent arguments and points regarding the validity of the report. The Commission unanimously voted to order the Department back to the drawing table to submit a report based on accurate science. THIS WAS A NICE WIN FOR INDUSTRY! Please especially thank Commissioner Ryan who did an excellent job in summarizing the arguments and representing our industry on the Commission. Thank you!!